A

Azizan bin Md. Arshad

J 29 cases

About J Azizan bin Md. Arshad

Azizan bin Md. Arshad has been involved in 29 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning August 2022 to January 2026. These cases are from the High Court (29 cases). Azizan bin Md. Arshad served as the delivering judge in 29 of these cases.

Key areas of jurisprudence include Background of proceeding: (1 cases), (a) Witnesses (b) Bundles (c) Section 114 (g) of The Evidence Act 1950 (1 cases), Analisa dan dapatan Mahkamah (1 cases). Azizan bin Md. Arshad holds the designation of Dato'.

29

Total Cases

29

Delivered

0

Sat On (Coram)

How many cases has Azizan bin Md. Arshad been involved in?

Azizan bin Md. Arshad has been involved in 29 published judgments from August 2022 to January 2026, serving as the delivering judge in 29 of them. Cases span the High Court (29 cases).

What types of cases does Azizan bin Md. Arshad typically handle?

Based on 29 published judgments, Azizan bin Md. Arshad's most common case types include Background of proceeding: (1 cases) and (a) Witnesses (b) Bundles (c) Section 114 (g) of The Evidence Act 1950 (1 cases).

Practice Areas

In LAI CHENG OOI (F) (THE EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF LEE TAIN TSHUNG @ LEE THIEN CHIUNG, DECEASED) V LIM SAN PEEN (LIQUIDATOR FOR NASLEI ENTERPRISE SDN BHD) & ANOR AND OTHER APPEALS 2017 6 MLJ 218, held: (1) Any ex parte order was liable to be set aside by the party which had been served with such an order or by any party which was affected by such order. The court was not functus officio as the right of the party affected to be heard remained subsisting. Separate proceedings to impeach the ex parte order were not mandatory. Orders obtained in breach of the rules of natural justice could be set aside in the same proceedings or in collateral proceedings ex debito justitiae (see para 12). (2)…. (3) It did not matter whether the same or different judge set aside the ex parte order as either judge would have the jurisdiction to set aside the ex parte orders. As the orders were entered in the absence of parties who ought to have been heard, it would come under the exception to the general rule as to functus officio (see para 15). 2 In a summary of the reasons, it can be concluded that: (i) It is time-barred under Section 6 (3) of the Limitation Act 1963 (ii) An Application for an extension of time cannot be granted after the 12-year period has expired. (iii) The Second Order, which is a subset extension of the First Order, is also null and void; and (iv) Section 33 of the Limitatation Act 1963 does not apply in this case. 1 In a summary of the reasons, it can be concluded that: 1 (i) It is time-barred under Section 6 (3) of the Limitation Act 1963 (ii) An Application for an extension of time cannot be granted after the 12-year period has expired. (iii) The Second Order, which is a subset extension of the First Order, is also null and void; and (iv) Section 33 of the Limitatation Act 1963 does not apply in this case. 1 The Writ action does not duplicate Civil Suit 6. When pleadings show a valid cause of action and indicate legal issues requiring detailed argument, the court should not dismiss the suit. Additionally, the court must determine if relevant factual matters require witness evidence; if so, it should not dismiss the claim under O 18 r 19 of the ROC 2012. 1 All civil appeals from a Subordinate Court shall be by way of re-hearing See S. 29 Courts of Judicature Act 196 and Order 55 Rule 2 of the Rules of Court 2012 (i) In Chan Lai Yoke V Ess Engineering Sdn Bhd. 2021 1 LNS 1963, held that “Order 55 Rule 2 of the Rules of Court 2012 provides that all appeals to the High Court shall be by way of re-hearing. The White Book on the Malaysian Civil Procedure 2021 Volume 1, page 812 at paragraph 55/2/1 states as follows: In a re-hearing, a judge is not tasked to consider whether the lower court judge had exercised his discretion correctly or had properly considered the relevant material. He would consider the case as if it came before him for the first time.” 1 Preliminary observation of the right to appeal 1 This is an application for leave to appeal against the decision of the High Court. 1

Cases Delivered (29)

pa-33-415-12-2021 MYHC

TAN WAN CHING v LIM PENG KUN

15 January 2026

pa-12b-18-06-2025 MYHC

ENG KAH LEONG v CHEE LAY HWA

27 November 2025

pa-29ncc-517-12-2022 MYHC

PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN CSPM Sdn Bhd PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN NG LEE ENG

4 November 2025

pa-12b-17-05-2025 MYHC

ROSALIND TAN KHENG SUAN v NG KOK KHOON

28 September 2025

pa-33-73-03-2025 MYHC

LEE WAI CHENG v CHENG LING KEUN

25 September 2025

pa-22ncvc-45-02-2020 MYHC

TRUSTEES OF BOON SAN TONG KHOO KONGSI (PENANG) REGISTERED v Hun Meng Development Sdn. Bhd.

22 September 2025

pa-16-7-04-2025 MYHC

ANG KEE CHYE v KETUA PENGARAH PERTUBUHAN KESELAMATAN SOSIAL

9 September 2025

pa-33-124-03-2023 MYHC

Ilene Tjong Ai Lan v Teh Chee Chow

2 September 2025

pa-23ncvc-20-11-2024 MYHC

QUEK WAN HONG v 1. ) GOH EE BOEY 2. ) TETUAN SEIRA & SHARIZAD (disaman sebagai sebuah firma)

pa-33-332-08-2023 MYHC

Srissarmila a/p Veeramuthu v Thienesh a/l Rajendhran

pa-12a-7-06-2025 MYHC

1. ) LEE KIAN KIONG 2. ) DESTINY CODE SDN BHD v 1. ) DATO' CHE SEOW FOON @ CHOW SEOW FOON 2. ) TAN SEE WIE 3. ) LEE KHENG SEONG 4. ) NG BOON THIAM 5. ) TENG BEE KIM 6. ) LIM POH LEE 7. ) OH SOONG TIN

pa-23ncvc-10-03-2021 MYHC

LIM LEONG HOCK v 1. ) HUA HANG SHIPPING & TRADING (M) SDN BHD 2. ) TUNG GIM CHUAN 3. ) PHOON SOOK FONG 4. ) LIM LEONG HENG

pa-12b-7-02-2025 MYHC

1. ) JAMALIAH BINTI AZIZAN ( MENUNTUT SEBAGAI ISTERI DAN TANGGUNGAN KEPADA ZULKARNAIN BIN AHMAD, SIMATI) 2. ) XXXX v 1. ) MUHAMAD SAIFUL ADLI BIN MD NASIR 2. ) MD NASIR BIN AHMAD

pa-22ncvc-157-09-2021 MYHC

1. ) LAM SHAO KOI 2. ) TEOH LEAN SEE 3. ) LAM SHE NA 4. ) LAM KEAT KOI 5. ) LAM YUEE CH'NG v 1. ) PENANG DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 2. ) VENICE GATEWAY SDN BHD

pa-37g-9-02-2024 MYHC

ANANDA KUMAR A/L KRISHNAN v 1. ) NG CHIN TAI 2. ) LS FISHERY SDN BHD PIHAK YANG DIGARNIS LOTUS'S STORES MALAYSIA SDN BHD

pa-16a-7-02-2025 MYHC

Malaysia Airports Sdn Bhd v Muhd Irfan Sani Bin Rashid

pa-24f-93-09-2024 MYHC

DANIEL PAUL GUERRARD v LORI ANNE-MARIE ROBINSON

pa-33-129-04-2025 MYHC

pa-22c-02-08-2017 MYHC

ATSH Construction Sdn Bhd v STRONG MIXED CONCRETE SDN. BHD. PIHAK KETIGA SSJ CONSULTING ENGINEERS SDN BHD

pa-22ncvc-55-03-2020 MYHC

ONG JOO MING v CHEW CHEE HONG

pa-12b-27-05-2024 MYHC

MUHAMMAD HAZIM BIN ABU SOUFI v 1. ) ONG KEAN TEONG 2. ) PACIFIC & ORIENT INSURANCE CO. BERHAD 3. ) LYE GEE KIM

pa-22ncvc-84-04-2021 MYHC

Dynasty Palace Sdn. Bhd. v 1. ) SHAHRIZAT RASHID & LEE 2. ) LIM CHAI LOY (didakwa sebagai seorang individu dan bekas rakan kongsi Sharizat Rashid & Lee) 3. ) LIM MOK SAN (didakwa sebagai seorang individu dan bekas rakan kongsi Sharizat Rashid & Lee (cawangan Pulau Pinang) 4. ) SHAHRIR ABDUL JALIL (didakwa sebagai seorang individu dan rakan kongsi Shahrizat Rashid & Lee) 5. ) YOHAN ANANDA RAJAN (didakwa sebagai seorang individu dan rakan kongsi Shahrizat Rashid & Lee) 6. ) LOO MAY PEARL (didak...

pa-22ncvc-49-03-2021 MYHC

1. ) ANG BEE CHIN 2. ) NG SWEE KIM 3. ) LEE SOO YING 4. ) CHING THONG LOO 5. ) NG LAI HENG 6. ) OOI SHU XIN 7. ) LOW SIEW EAN 8. ) ANG POH HONG 9. ) LEE TEIK MENG 10. ) LEE JIANG HENG 11. ) LIM TENG HO 12. ) KHOR BEE FUNG 13. ) SOON CHOON HOCK 14. ) CHEW GUEK BEE 15. ) ALEXANDER LIM AIK BENG 16. ) LIM YEW WAN AMELIA 17. ) DON SOH SENG HO 18. ) LIM TENG LEONG 19. ) MELVIN ANG WEI JINN 20. ) SEOW GIM SHEN 21. ) LEE KEAN BOON 22. ) NG CHOY YIM 23. ) NG WAI FERNG 24. ) CHEAH GIM SUN 25. ) TEH MEH...

20 February 2025

pa-12ancvc-39-11-2024 MYHC

TANG BOON KOK v 1. ) H'ng Bok Chuan 2. ) H'ng Hup Choong

19 February 2025

pa-33-328-08-2023 MYHC

CHUAN SENG HUAT v LEE TZIN TZIN

18 February 2025

pa-24f-95-09-2024 MYHC

ONG KO LYNN v CHEAH BENG KEONG

4 February 2025

pa-12a-9-06-2024 MYHC

PACIFIC & ORIENT INSURANCE CO BERHAD v 1. ) TAN PEK GAN 2. ) WAKIL PERIBADI (DIDAKWA SEBAGAI WAKIL SIMATI, LEE SIEW CHENG) 3. ) TAN BENG CHU (IBU KEPADA CHUAH SEW HOCK, SIMATI)

3 February 2025

21-09-tahun-2003 MYHC

KERAJAAN MALAYSIA v GOLD BRIDGE ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD (NO. SYARIKAT: 177473-T)

21-09-tahun-2004 MYHC

KERAJAAN MALAYSIA v ASENIA DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD (NO. SYARIKAT: 179837-T)