DANIEL PAUL GUERRARD v LORI ANNE-MARIE ROBINSON

pa-24f-93-09-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 10 June 2025 • PA-24F-93-09/2024

Catchwords

In conclusion, the preliminary objection raised by the Defendant is that the Plaintiff does not fall within the definition of "domicile" as provided under Section 3 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976. Therefore, it is the Defendant’s contention that the Plaintiff does not have sufficient legal standing to bring a claim under the provisions of the said Act.

Practice Areas

In conclusion, the preliminary objection raised by the Defendant is that the Plaintiff does not fall within the definition of "domicile" as provided under Section 3 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976. Therefore, it is the Defendant’s contention that the Plaintiff does not have sufficient legal standing to bring a claim under the provisions of the said Act.

Judges (1)

Azizan bin Md. Arshad Delivered

Parties (2)

Daniel Paul Guerrard Applicant Lori Anne-marie Robinson Respondent

Case Significance

DANIEL PAUL GUERRARD v LORI ANNE-MARIE ROBINSON is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 10, 2025 (citation: pa-24f-93-09-2024). The case was decided by Azizan bin Md. Arshad.

What was the outcome of DANIEL PAUL GUERRARD v LORI ANNE-MARIE ROBINSON?

DANIEL PAUL GUERRARD v LORI ANNE-MARIE ROBINSON is a High Court decision dated June 10, 2025. The case was heard by Azizan bin Md. Arshad. See the full judgment for details.