QUEK WAN HONG v 1. ) GOH EE BOEY 2. ) TETUAN SEIRA & SHARIZAD (disaman sebagai sebuah firma)
Catchwords
Analysis and findings The Law on Striking out (i) Bandar Builder Sdn Bhd v UMBC [1993] 3 MLJ36 (ii) Sivarasa Rasiah & Ors v Che Hamzah Che Ismail & Ors. [2012] 1 CLJ 75; [2012] 1 MLJ 473 (iii)Mohamed Yusop Bin Abdul Wahab v American Express (M) Sdn. Bhd. (2002) 6 MLJ 507 (iv) Boey Oi Leng v Trans Recourses Corporation Sdn, Bhd. (2002) 1 CLJ 405 at 410 (v) Mooney & Ors v Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company & Anor (1967) 1 MLJ 87
Practice Areas
Analysis and findings The Law on Striking out (i) Bandar Builder Sdn Bhd v UMBC 1993 3 MLJ36 (ii) Sivarasa Rasiah & Ors v Che Hamzah Che Ismail & Ors. 2012 1 CLJ 75; 2012 1 MLJ 473 (iii)Mohamed Yusop Bin Abdul Wahab v American Express (M) Sdn. Bhd. (2002) 6 MLJ 507 (iv) Boey Oi Leng v Trans Recourses Corporation Sdn, Bhd. (2002) 1 CLJ 405 at 410 (v) Mooney & Ors v Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company & Anor (1967) 1 MLJ 87
Judges (1)
Case Significance
QUEK WAN HONG v 1. ) GOH EE BOEY 2. ) TETUAN SEIRA & SHARIZAD (disaman sebaga... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated August 27, 2025 (citation: pa-23ncvc-20-11-2024). The case was decided by Azizan bin Md. Arshad.
Key issues: Analysis and findings.
What was the outcome of QUEK WAN HONG v 1. ) GOH EE BOEY 2. ) TETUAN SEIRA & SHARIZAD (disaman sebaga...?
QUEK WAN HONG v 1. ) GOH EE BOEY 2. ) TETUAN SEIRA & SHARIZAD (disaman sebaga... is a High Court decision dated August 27, 2025. The case was heard by Azizan bin Md. Arshad. See the full judgment for details.