Civil procedure

180 cases · December 1899 to February 2026

Case Volume by Year

1
99
2
17
4
18
6
19
4
20
3
21
1
22
1
24
153
25
5
26
1899–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Whether the Plaintiff has proven the claim for goods and services supplied to the Defendant — Whether the Defendants are liable for the guarantees — Whether the Defendants in counterclaim have conspired jointly to defraud the Plaintiff 3 Parties— Proper parties to be sued — Whether proper to sue sole proprietor in his own name and to add below the name within brackets the name of the firm — Whether respondent was properly named at the adjudication proceedings — Whether action can be taken against a body that has no legal status — Whether the Adjudicator is clothed with the jurisdiction — Whether adjudication proceedings valid 2 Banking and Finance — Islamic banking — Summary judgment — Recovery of outstanding sums under Murabahah term financing, Cashline-i and Tradeline-i facilities — Whether genuine triable issues raised — Defence based on non-receipt of demand letter — Whether the claim is premature — Whether proceedings must first be taken against the principal borrower before recourse to the guarantors — Guarantee and Indemnity — Whether certificate of indebtedness conclusive — Whether service of certificate upon defendants a precondition –Whether defendants have proven manifest error — Principal liability clause — Indemnity clause — Rules of Court 2012, Order 14 rr 1, & 3. 2 Appeal — Appeal against summary judgment — Appeal against striking out of counterclaim — Applicable appellate standard — Whether re-hearing or review of discretion — Whether genuine triable issue raised — Distinction between limbs under O 18 r 19(1) Rules of Court 2012 — Sub-paragraph (a) confined to defects on the face of pleadings — Prohibition on affidavit evidence under O 18 r 19(2) for sub-paragraph (a) — Scope of sub-paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) — Whether counterclaim for fraud and misrepresentation properly struck out under sub-paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) — Lack of material particulars — Whether counterclaim obviously unsustainable — Rules of Court 2012, O.14 r.1 & r.3, & O.8 r.19. 2 Courts of Judicature Act 1964, s 67 — Rules of the Court of Appeal 1994, Rules 5(1), 5(3) and 5(4) — procedural law — striking out of notice of appeal — preliminary objection — filing of single notice of appeal for more than one decision — whether decisions were clearly and concisely identified 2 Appeal — Legal burden of proof — Reversal of burden — Distinction between legal burden and Evidential burden Evidence — Circumstantial evidence — Expert evidence — whether Non-expert opinion preferred over expert testimony — Documentary evidence — Viva voce testimony — Witness credibility — Inconsistencies and contradictions- failure to consider reliability- Maritime law — Bunkering operations — Fuel segregation — Absence of contemporaneous records Appellate review — Erroneous appreciation of evidence — Findings plainly wrong 1 Summary judgment — Order 14 r 1 Rules of Court 2012 — Whether defendants disclosed bona fide triable issue — Admitted and quantified debt — Subsequent repayment agreement — Whether defence a sham or afterthought — Principles governing summary disposal — Whether judgment ought to be entered summarily 1 Appeal — Record of appeal — Memorandum of appeal — Failure to file record of appeal within the prescribed time — Omission of memorandum of appeal — No application for extension of time — Whether the appeal is incompetent — Order 55 r 4, Rules of Court 2012 — Whether Order 1A may be invoked — Mandatory procedural compliance — Appeal struck out. 1 Res judicata — Cause of action estoppel — Issue estoppel — Earlier action dismissed as premature — No termination notice issued under facility agreement — Whether dismissal on procedural ground bars subsequent action after valid termination notice — Whether new cause of action accrued — Doctrine not absolute — Whether injustice would result if applied 1 Default judgment — Application to set aside — Whether default judgment was regularly obtained — Whether application filed out of time — Order 42 rule 13 Rules of Court 2012 — Cogent reasons for delay — Five-year delay — No explanation offered — Whether defendants demonstrated a defence on the merits with a real prospect of success — Failure to file any proposed defence — Application dismissed — Requirements to set aside — Threshold for setting aside regular judgment — Defence must have a real prospect of success and carry degree of conviction — Service — Contractual deeming provision — Service by registered post deemed received on fifth day — Validity of contractual service clause. 1 Amendment of pleadings — Late amendment — After close of pleadings and completion of pre-trial case management — Trial dates fixed — Whether application bona fide — Whether cogent explanation for delay shown — Whether amendments introduce new causes of action — Whether amendments fundamentally alter character of action — Whether prejudice to defendants compensable by costs 1 Late filing — Written submissions — Non-compliance with court directions — Reply submissions filed out of time without leave — Rejected. • Conveyancing — Stakeholder solicitor — Appointment inferred from course of dealings — No formal acceptance not fatal. • Evidence — Bank statements — Admissibility — Subpoenaed bank witnesses — Weight vs admissibility — Admitted. • Stakeholder monies — Receipt into client account — Failure to remit matured sums — Breach established. • Partnership — Law firm — Branch autonomy — No notice to third party — Partners jointly and severally liable. • Quantum — RM1,439,022.89 proven after set-off — No proof of fixed deposit profit/hibah. • Interest — Pre- and post-judgment interest at 5% per annum — Costs awarded. 1 Summary judgment — Order 14 r 1 Rules of Court 2012 — “Triable issue” — Late filing — Non-compliance with court directions — Affidavit in reply and written submissions filed on hearing date — Rejection/striking out — Defendant confined to oral submissions on point of law only — Discretion — Prejudice — Revenue Law / Income Tax — Recovery of tax as civil debt — Income Tax Act 1967 (Act 53) — ss 103, 106(1), 106(3), 142(1), 145(2)(c) — “Pay first, argue later” — Deemed service of notices of assessment — Certificate under s 142(1) as sufficient evidence — Court not to entertain plea that assessment excessive/incorrectly assessed — Remedy by appeal to Special Commissioners 1 Summary judgment — Application under O 14 Rules of Court 2012 — Evidential threshold — Whether defendant raised bona fide triable issue — Bare denials and speculative allegations — Absence of documentary proof — When summary judgment appropriate 1 Striking out — Statement of claim — Whether discloses reasonable cause of action — Whether frivolous, vexatious or abuse of process — Allegations of fraud, illegality and misrepresentation — Pleadings lacking particulars — Plain and obvious case — Summary jurisdiction of court — Rules of Court 2012, O 18 r 19(1)(a)–(d) 1 Striking out — Order 18 r.19(1)(a),(b),(c),(d) Rules of Court 2012 — Whether claim plainly and obviously unsustainable — applicable principle in Bandar Builders — Summary process to be exercised sparingly — Expiry of mining lease upon death of holder — Alleged mistake of law and frustration — Whether agreement void — Mixed questions of fact and law requiring full trial 1 whether dismissal of striking out action appealable — s. 68(1)(f) to read together with ss.67 and 3 Courts of Judicature Act 1964 — Principles in MT Ventures Sdn Bhd & Anor — Appeals filed by the 1st and 2nd defendants against this Court’s dismissals of their striking out application fall within the permissible appeals as set out in MT Ventures. 1 Counterclaim — Breach of contract — Exclusive distributorship — Whether Letter of Appointment prohibited delegation to third parties — Interpretation of written contract — Parol evidence rule — Sections 91 & 92 Evidence Act 1950 — Whether termination was lawful — Whether failure to protest termination amounts to waiver — Whether damages for loss of tender, inventory, and reputation recoverable — Burden of proof — Sections 101 & 102 Evidence Act 1950 — Damages under section 74 Contracts Act 1950 — Principles of Hadley v Baxendale — Mitigation of loss — Whether reputational loss claim sustainable in contract — Malik v Bank of Credit applied — Claim dismissed. 1 Striking out — Whether claim plainly unsustainable in law — Order 18 r 19 Rules of Court 2012 Company law — Winding up — Sale and purchase agreements executed after presentation of winding-up petition — Whether void ab initio — Absence of validation order Limitation — Action founded on contract — Six-year limitation period — Whether claim time-barred — Section 6(1)(a) Limitation Act 1953 — Alleged fraud — Whether sufficient to invoke section 29 Pleadings — Fraud — Requirement of strict pleading and particulars — Whether triable issues disclosed 1 Trial — Re-examination of witness — Reference to document not disclosed to opposing party and not part of common bundle — Whether document admissible — Exclusion of evidence 1 + 175 more

Parties— Proper parties to be sued — Whether proper to sue sole proprietor in his own name and to add below the name within brackets the name of the firm — Whether respondent was properly named at the adjudication proceedings — Whether action can be taken against a body that has no legal status — Whether the Adjudicator is clothed with the jurisdiction — Whether adjudication proceedings valid 2 cases

w-02ca-1483-08-2024 HONGLER ENTERPRISE SDN BHD v CHAI HON SANG (berniaga sebagai HOCK SENG TRADING & CONSTRUCTION)
22 June 2025
w-02ca-980-06-2024 HOCK SENG TRADING & CONSTRUCTION v HONGLER ENTERPRISE SDN BHD
22 June 2025

Banking and Finance — Islamic banking — Summary judgment — Recovery of outstanding sums under Murabahah term financing, Cashline-i and Tradeline-i facilities — Whether genuine triable issues raised — Defence based on non-receipt of demand letter — Whether the claim is premature — Whether proceedings must first be taken against the principal borrower before recourse to the guarantors — Guarantee and Indemnity — Whether certificate of indebtedness conclusive — Whether service of certificate upon defendants a precondition –Whether defendants have proven manifest error — Principal liability clause — Indemnity clause — Rules of Court 2012, Order 14 rr 1, & 3. 2 cases

wa-22m-100-01-2025 MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD v 1. ) CARZO IMPORT (M) SDN BHD 2. ) DELON LEE KEAN YIP 3. ) CHEONG WAI KEH 4. ) CARZO HOLDINGS BERHAD
8 June 2025
wa-22m-109-01-2025 MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD v 1. ) CARZO SDN BHD 2. ) DELON LEE KEAN YIP 3. ) CHEONG WAI KEH 4. ) CARZO HOLDINGS BERHAD
8 June 2025

Appeal — Appeal against summary judgment — Appeal against striking out of counterclaim — Applicable appellate standard — Whether re-hearing or review of discretion — Whether genuine triable issue raised — Distinction between limbs under O 18 r 19(1) Rules of Court 2012 — Sub-paragraph (a) confined to defects on the face of pleadings — Prohibition on affidavit evidence under O 18 r 19(2) for sub-paragraph (a) — Scope of sub-paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) — Whether counterclaim for fraud and misrepresentation properly struck out under sub-paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) — Lack of material particulars — Whether counterclaim obviously unsustainable — Rules of Court 2012, O.14 r.1 & r.3, & O.8 r.19. 2 cases

wa-12am-3-01-2025 OOI SWEE KING v STANDARD CHARTERED SAADIQ BERHAD
21 May 2025
wa-12am-4-01-2025 OOI SWEE KING v STANDARD CHARTERED SAADIQ BERHAD
21 May 2025

Courts of Judicature Act 1964, s 67 — Rules of the Court of Appeal 1994, Rules 5(1), 5(3) and 5(4) — procedural law — striking out of notice of appeal — preliminary objection — filing of single notice of appeal for more than one decision — whether decisions were clearly and concisely identified 2 cases

02f-43-04-2019w Khairy Jamaluddin v Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim
14 December 2020
03-2-08-2020n GUINNESS ANCHOR MARKETING SDN BHD v MAN SENG TRADING & MARKETING SDN BHD
14 December 2020

Summary judgment — Order 14 r 1 Rules of Court 2012 — Whether defendants disclosed bona fide triable issue — Admitted and quantified debt — Subsequent repayment agreement — Whether defence a sham or afterthought — Principles governing summary disposal — Whether judgment ought to be entered summarily 1 case

wa-22ncvc-578-10-2025 WHATMAN CAPITAL PTE. LTD. v 1. ) Dato' Ng Meng Kee 2. ) Datuk Ng Meng Poh 3. ) MEGA FORTRIS BERHAD
26 January 2026

Appeal — Record of appeal — Memorandum of appeal — Failure to file record of appeal within the prescribed time — Omission of memorandum of appeal — No application for extension of time — Whether the appeal is incompetent — Order 55 r 4, Rules of Court 2012 — Whether Order 1A may be invoked — Mandatory procedural compliance — Appeal struck out. 1 case

da-12b-39-10-2024 Noor Shahirman Bin Mohamad Nawawi v Muhammad Hanif Bin Ismail
21 January 2026

Res judicata — Cause of action estoppel — Issue estoppel — Earlier action dismissed as premature — No termination notice issued under facility agreement — Whether dismissal on procedural ground bars subsequent action after valid termination notice — Whether new cause of action accrued — Doctrine not absolute — Whether injustice would result if applied 1 case

wa-22m-131-02-2024 Majlis Amanah Rakyat (MARA) v SHABRI BIN SULONG
13 January 2026

Default judgment — Application to set aside — Whether default judgment was regularly obtained — Whether application filed out of time — Order 42 rule 13 Rules of Court 2012 — Cogent reasons for delay — Five-year delay — No explanation offered — Whether defendants demonstrated a defence on the merits with a real prospect of success — Failure to file any proposed defence — Application dismissed — Requirements to set aside — Threshold for setting aside regular judgment — Defence must have a real prospect of success and carry degree of conviction — Service — Contractual deeming provision — Service by registered post deemed received on fifth day — Validity of contractual service clause. 1 case

ta-22m-2-01-2020 MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD v 1. ) TD POULTRY SDN BHD 2. ) VISION POULTRY SDN BHD 3. ) ROSDI BIN ABD GHANI 4. ) SYARIZAL BIN KAMARUN ADBAR 5. ) ZULKIFFLI BIN ABDUL GHANI
7 January 2026

Amendment of pleadings — Late amendment — After close of pleadings and completion of pre-trial case management — Trial dates fixed — Whether application bona fide — Whether cogent explanation for delay shown — Whether amendments introduce new causes of action — Whether amendments fundamentally alter character of action — Whether prejudice to defendants compensable by costs 1 case

da-22ncvc-28-06-2022 CHIN YET LUN v 1. ) SILVER MATRIX RESOURCES (M) SDN BHD 2. ) Azman Bin Idris 3. ) Maslinatulnasrah Binti Mansor
28 December 2025

Late filing — Written submissions — Non-compliance with court directions — Reply submissions filed out of time without leave — Rejected. • Conveyancing — Stakeholder solicitor — Appointment inferred from course of dealings — No formal acceptance not fatal. • Evidence — Bank statements — Admissibility — Subpoenaed bank witnesses — Weight vs admissibility — Admitted. • Stakeholder monies — Receipt into client account — Failure to remit matured sums — Breach established. • Partnership — Law firm — Branch autonomy — No notice to third party — Partners jointly and severally liable. • Quantum — RM1,439,022.89 proven after set-off — No proof of fixed deposit profit/hibah. • Interest — Pre- and post-judgment interest at 5% per annum — Costs awarded. 1 case

ja-22ncvc-14-01-2023 JOHOR LAND BERHAD v 1. ) AISHATON BINTI ABU BAKAR 2. ) MOHD TALHA BIN MOHAMED ARIFFIN 3. ) RUHAIZAH BINTI ABDUL HAMID 4. ) ZAINUL RIJAL BIN ABU BAKAR
22 December 2025

Summary judgment — Order 14 r 1 Rules of Court 2012 — “Triable issue” — Late filing — Non-compliance with court directions — Affidavit in reply and written submissions filed on hearing date — Rejection/striking out — Defendant confined to oral submissions on point of law only — Discretion — Prejudice — Revenue Law / Income Tax — Recovery of tax as civil debt — Income Tax Act 1967 (Act 53) — ss 103, 106(1), 106(3), 142(1), 145(2)(c) — “Pay first, argue later” — Deemed service of notices of assessment — Certificate under s 142(1) as sufficient evidence — Court not to entertain plea that assessment excessive/incorrectly assessed — Remedy by appeal to Special Commissioners 1 case

ja-21ncvc-6-05-2025 Kerajaan Malaysia v R SURESH A/L RAMU
21 December 2025

Summary judgment — Application under O 14 Rules of Court 2012 — Evidential threshold — Whether defendant raised bona fide triable issue — Bare denials and speculative allegations — Absence of documentary proof — When summary judgment appropriate 1 case

ta-22ip-1-05-2025 KOTRA PHARMA (M) SDN. BHD. v LAU TIAN THYE B/S FARMASI MEGA CARE
21 December 2025

Striking out — Statement of claim — Whether discloses reasonable cause of action — Whether frivolous, vexatious or abuse of process — Allegations of fraud, illegality and misrepresentation — Pleadings lacking particulars — Plain and obvious case — Summary jurisdiction of court — Rules of Court 2012, O 18 r 19(1)(a)–(d) 1 case

wa-22ncvc-167-03-2025 BAEV Holdings Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Yong Chun Khiong 2. ) MBL Agarwood ECO Leisureland Sdn Bhd
21 December 2025

Striking out — Order 18 r.19(1)(a),(b),(c),(d) Rules of Court 2012 — Whether claim plainly and obviously unsustainable — applicable principle in Bandar Builders — Summary process to be exercised sparingly — Expiry of mining lease upon death of holder — Alleged mistake of law and frustration — Whether agreement void — Mixed questions of fact and law requiring full trial 1 case

ca-22ncvc-15-04-2024 GOLDEN CENTURY SYNERGIES SDN BHD v 1. ) DATIN SRI DATO’ HAJJAH MIMI ASMARA BINTI ABDUL MALIK 2. ) NURUL IZZAH BINTI OMAR 3. ) AHMAD NIZAM BIN RAMLY
17 December 2025

whether dismissal of striking out action appealable — s. 68(1)(f) to read together with ss.67 and 3 Courts of Judicature Act 1964 — Principles in MT Ventures Sdn Bhd & Anor — Appeals filed by the 1st and 2nd defendants against this Court’s dismissals of their striking out application fall within the permissible appeals as set out in MT Ventures. 1 case

ca-22ncvc-15-04-2024 GOLDEN CENTURY SYNERGIES SDN BHD v 1. ) DATIN SRI DATO’ HAJJAH MIMI ASMARA BINTI ABDUL MALIK 2. ) NURUL IZZAH BINTI OMAR 3. ) AHMAD NIZAM BIN RAMLY
17 December 2025

Counterclaim — Breach of contract — Exclusive distributorship — Whether Letter of Appointment prohibited delegation to third parties — Interpretation of written contract — Parol evidence rule — Sections 91 & 92 Evidence Act 1950 — Whether termination was lawful — Whether failure to protest termination amounts to waiver — Whether damages for loss of tender, inventory, and reputation recoverable — Burden of proof — Sections 101 & 102 Evidence Act 1950 — Damages under section 74 Contracts Act 1950 — Principles of Hadley v Baxendale — Mitigation of loss — Whether reputational loss claim sustainable in contract — Malik v Bank of Credit applied — Claim dismissed. 1 case

wa-23ncvc-67-10-2023 1. ) Mohd Abdul Wahab Bin Said 2. ) Flight Dynamic Resources Sendirian Berhad v Mforce Bike Holdings Sdn Bhd
16 December 2025

Striking out — Whether claim plainly unsustainable in law — Order 18 r 19 Rules of Court 2012 Company law — Winding up — Sale and purchase agreements executed after presentation of winding-up petition — Whether void ab initio — Absence of validation order Limitation — Action founded on contract — Six-year limitation period — Whether claim time-barred — Section 6(1)(a) Limitation Act 1953 — Alleged fraud — Whether sufficient to invoke section 29 Pleadings — Fraud — Requirement of strict pleading and particulars — Whether triable issues disclosed 1 case

ba-22ncvc-48-02-2025 YAP YEE HOO v 1. ) MUJUR ZAMAN SDN. BHD. 2. ) MZ DEVELOPMENT SDN. BHD. 3. ) PENGARAH TANAH DAN GALIAN SELANGOR 4. ) Kerajaan Negeri Selangor 5. ) PGCC ASSETS HOLDINGS SDN. BHD. 6. ) PARAGON PINNACLE SDN. BHD.
14 December 2025

Trial — Re-examination of witness — Reference to document not disclosed to opposing party and not part of common bundle — Whether document admissible — Exclusion of evidence 1 case

wa-11bncvc-22-06-2025 KURNIA EKUITI SDN. BHD. v TM TECHNOLOGY SERVICES SDN. BHD.
9 December 2025

Security for Costs — Order 23, rule 1, Rules of Court 2012 — Plaintiff ordinarily resident out of jurisdiction — Two-stage inquiry — Whether threshold condition satisfied — Exercise of judicial discretion — Factors to be considered — Plaintiff's assets within jurisdiction — Whether property subject to litigation constitutes sufficient security — Security ordered in reduced amount 1 case

wa-24ncvc-4976-12-2024 Mohammed Shabaz Khan v 1. ) Crest Worldwide Resources Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation) 2. ) Shamir Kumar Nandy
1 December 2025

Originating summons — Co-ownership of immovable property — Breakdown of relationship between co-owners — Power of court to order sale — Whether just and equitable to terminate co-ownership — Courts of Judicature Act 1964, s 25 and Sch, para 3 — Rules of Court 2012, O 31 r 1 1 case

wa-24ncvc-2468-07-2024 WONG MUN HOE v MAR SZE LING
27 November 2025

Judgment in default — Setting aside — Delay — Application made out of time — Knowledge of judgment — Failure to update contractual address — No prayer for extension of time — Laches and prejudice — Whether application fatally defective — Regularity of service — Contractual mode of service — Registered post — Deemed service — Actual receipt immaterial — Tactical applications — Real prospect of success — Stricter test — Deliberate default — Whether JIDA regularly obtained — Rules of Court 2012 O 42 r 13 — Federal Constitution, item 7(j) of the Federal List in the Ninth Schedule. 1 case

wa-22m-1024-08-2024 MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD v 1. ) TRANSKON SDN. BHD. 2. ) YEE KIM MUN
25 November 2025

Preliminary issues — Order 33 r 2 Rules of Court 2012 — Application to determine limitation, fraudulent concealment and injury as preliminary issues — Whether issues raised are pure questions of law — Whether issues involve disputed facts and expert medical evidence — Whether determination would result in piecemeal adjudication Limitation Act 1953 ss 6(1)(a), 29 — Medical negligence — Product liability — Alleged metallosis arising from hip implant — Global recall — Alleged fraudulent concealment — Whether suitable for summary determination — Order 33 application dismissed — Action to proceed to full trial. 1 case

ba-22ncvc-440-10-2023 VIJAYAKUMAR A/L RAJENDRAM v JOHNSON & JOHNSON SDN. BHD. PIHAK TERKILAN Universiti Malaya (UM)
23 November 2025

Striking out — Application under O 18 r 19(1)(a), (b) & (d) Rules of Court 2012 — Whether claim disclosed reasonable cause of action — Whether claim plainly and obviously unsustainable — Presence of triable issues — Prohibition against conducting mini-trial — Bandar Builder Sdn Bhd v United Malayan Banking Corp Bhd applied 1 case

wa-24ncvc-4892-12-2024 BADAN PENGURUSAN BERSAMA ARTE PLUS @ JALAN AMPANG v 1. ) AMPANG PROPERTY SDN. BHD. 2. ) N JAYA SDN. BHD.
23 November 2025

Summary judgment — O.14 Rules of Court 2012 — Claim for payment for maintenance and repair works — Works completed and acknowledged by signed and stamped documents — Partial payments made without protest — Clear contemporaneous documentary evidence — Defences of inflated claims, collusion, absence of purchase orders and reliance on internal SOP unsupported and raised belatedly — Internal SOP not binding on plaintiff — Silence and partial payments gave rise to estoppel — No bona fide triable issue on principal sum — Summary judgment correctly granted — Contractual interest not suitable for determination under O 14. 1 case

wa-22ncc-202-03-2024 1. ) ZAINI BINTI HASSAN (berniaga di bawah nama dan gaya ZAIWI ENTERPRISE (No. Pendaftaran Perniagaan. 199603117872 (PG0018203-W)) 2. ) MOHAMMAD ARIF BIN AZIZ (berniaga di bawah nama dan gaya ZAIWI ENTERPRISE (No. Pendaftaran Perniagaan. 199603117872 (PG0018203-W)) v RADICARE(M) SDN BHD
20 November 2025

Key Statutes

Rules of Court 2012
cited in 4 cases
Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012
cited in 2 cases
Specific Relief Act 1950 (Cap 137)
cited in 2 cases
Limitation Act 1953
cited in 1 case
Limitation Act 1953 (Cap 254)
cited in 1 case
Limitation Act 1953
cited in 1 case

Court Distribution

MYHC 174 MYFC 21 MYCOA 6

Key People & Firms

Top Judges

Yusrin Faidz bin Yusoff 33 Moh Kok Wai 14 Muhammad Adam @ Edward bin Abdullah 14 Mohd Arief Emran bin Arifin 12 Azahar bin Mohamed 11

Top Firms

Vilasiny Gan & Co. 2 Kheng Hoe & Lee Yuen 2 Ram Yogan Sivam 1 Thangaraj & Associates 1 Ranjit Singh & Yeoh 1

Top Lawyers

Chan Kheng Hoe 2 Yang Lee Yuen 2 Pung Kian Bang 2 Gan Yi Yang 2 Vilasiny a/p Gannasen 2

Cases

Page 1 of 8
w-02admw-443-03-2022
Langkawi Yacht Club Bhd v 1. ) SUZANNAH HELEN HARVEY 2. ) RONAN FRANCIS HARVEY
22 February 2026
MYCOA
wa-22ncvc-578-10-2025
WHATMAN CAPITAL PTE. LTD. v 1. ) Dato' Ng Meng Kee 2. ) Datuk Ng Meng Poh 3. ) MEGA FORTRIS BERHAD
26 January 2026
MYHC
da-12b-39-10-2024
Noor Shahirman Bin Mohamad Nawawi v Muhammad Hanif Bin Ismail
21 January 2026
MYHC
wa-22m-131-02-2024
Majlis Amanah Rakyat (MARA) v SHABRI BIN SULONG
13 January 2026
MYHC
ta-22m-2-01-2020
MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD v 1. ) TD POULTRY SDN BHD 2. ) VISION POULTRY SDN BHD 3. ) ROSDI BIN ABD GHANI 4. ) SYARIZAL BIN KAMARUN ADBAR 5. ) ZULKIFFLI BIN ABDUL GHANI
7 January 2026
MYHC
da-22ncvc-28-06-2022
CHIN YET LUN v 1. ) SILVER MATRIX RESOURCES (M) SDN BHD 2. ) Azman Bin Idris 3. ) Maslinatulnasrah Binti Mansor
28 December 2025
MYHC
ja-22ncvc-14-01-2023
JOHOR LAND BERHAD v 1. ) AISHATON BINTI ABU BAKAR 2. ) MOHD TALHA BIN MOHAMED ARIFFIN 3. ) RUHAIZAH BINTI ABDUL HAMID 4. ) ZAINUL RIJAL BIN ABU BAKAR
22 December 2025
MYHC
ja-21ncvc-6-05-2025
Kerajaan Malaysia v R SURESH A/L RAMU
21 December 2025
MYHC
ta-22ip-1-05-2025
KOTRA PHARMA (M) SDN. BHD. v LAU TIAN THYE B/S FARMASI MEGA CARE
21 December 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncvc-167-03-2025
BAEV Holdings Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Yong Chun Khiong 2. ) MBL Agarwood ECO Leisureland Sdn Bhd
21 December 2025
MYHC
ca-22ncvc-15-04-2024
GOLDEN CENTURY SYNERGIES SDN BHD v 1. ) DATIN SRI DATO’ HAJJAH MIMI ASMARA BINTI ABDUL MALIK 2. ) NURUL IZZAH BINTI OMAR 3. ) AHMAD NIZAM BIN RAMLY
17 December 2025
MYHC
wa-23ncvc-67-10-2023
1. ) Mohd Abdul Wahab Bin Said 2. ) Flight Dynamic Resources Sendirian Berhad v Mforce Bike Holdings Sdn Bhd
16 December 2025
MYHC
ba-22ncvc-48-02-2025
YAP YEE HOO v 1. ) MUJUR ZAMAN SDN. BHD. 2. ) MZ DEVELOPMENT SDN. BHD. 3. ) PENGARAH TANAH DAN GALIAN SELANGOR 4. ) Kerajaan Negeri Selangor 5. ) PGCC ASSETS HOLDINGS SDN. BHD. 6. ) PARAGON PINNACLE SDN. BHD.
14 December 2025
MYHC
wa-11bncvc-22-06-2025
KURNIA EKUITI SDN. BHD. v TM TECHNOLOGY SERVICES SDN. BHD.
9 December 2025
MYHC
wa-24ncvc-5150-12-2024
1. ) HALIL IZRAN BIN ZAHID 2. ) NAIMAH BINTI MOHAMAD NOH 3. ) SITI NURUL AIN BINTI MOHD ZAWAWI 4. ) LOW PEI FENG 5. ) YULIZAH BINTI PARDI 6. ) FATIN NURAIN BINTI KAMARUZAMAN 7. ) HARYANTI BINTI IBRAHIM 8. ) MOHD SHAHRIL BIN MOHD SHAFI 9. ) MOHD SYAFIQ BIN MOHD SHAH 10. ) NUR HIDAYAH BINTI MARZUKHI 11. ) KAMARUZAMAN BIN AMAT 12. ) MUHAMMAD HAFIZ BIN ABDUL RAHMAN SITHIRAVEL 13. ) SITI NUR AISHAH BINTI SALIMON 14. ) AZNIZA BINTI MOHAMED 15. ) WAN HABIBULLAH BINTI WAN IBRAHIM 16. ) MOHD RIZAL BIN...
7 December 2025
MYHC
wa-24ncvc-4976-12-2024
Mohammed Shabaz Khan v 1. ) Crest Worldwide Resources Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation) 2. ) Shamir Kumar Nandy
1 December 2025
MYHC
wa-24ncvc-1380-04-2024
TETUAN TAN CHAP & ASSOCIATES v 1. ) KKB POULTRY FARMING SDN BHD 2. ) KHEW WEI SIANG 3. ) KHEW KOK SENG 4. ) LAU LAI HUN 5. ) KHEW KOK FEI
30 November 2025
MYHC
wa-24ncvc-2468-07-2024
WONG MUN HOE v MAR SZE LING
27 November 2025
MYHC
ba-22ncc-118-06-2025
SENA TRAFFIC SYSTEMS SDN. BHD. v 1. ) AR-RIFQI SDN. BHD. 2. ) ZAIMIL AZHAR BIN ZAINAL 3. ) ITMAX SYSTEMS SDN BHD 4. ) Tan Sri Tan Boon Hock 5. ) Sharifah Maizura Binti Syed Mohamad Rithuan 6. ) RONY ZHANG 7. ) ZHANG ZIYANG 8. ) SENA TRAFFIC SYSTEM SDN BHD
25 November 2025
MYHC
wa-22m-1024-08-2024
MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD v 1. ) TRANSKON SDN. BHD. 2. ) YEE KIM MUN
25 November 2025
MYHC
ba-22ncvc-440-10-2023
VIJAYAKUMAR A/L RAJENDRAM v JOHNSON & JOHNSON SDN. BHD. PIHAK TERKILAN Universiti Malaya (UM)
23 November 2025
MYHC
wa-24ncvc-4892-12-2024
BADAN PENGURUSAN BERSAMA ARTE PLUS @ JALAN AMPANG v 1. ) AMPANG PROPERTY SDN. BHD. 2. ) N JAYA SDN. BHD.
23 November 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncc-202-03-2024
1. ) ZAINI BINTI HASSAN (berniaga di bawah nama dan gaya ZAIWI ENTERPRISE (No. Pendaftaran Perniagaan. 199603117872 (PG0018203-W)) 2. ) MOHAMMAD ARIF BIN AZIZ (berniaga di bawah nama dan gaya ZAIWI ENTERPRISE (No. Pendaftaran Perniagaan. 199603117872 (PG0018203-W)) v RADICARE(M) SDN BHD
20 November 2025
MYHC
ta-22ncc-2-01-2025
PROOF INDUSTRIES SDN.BHD. v 1. ) KETENGAH PERWIRA SDN.BHD. 2. ) EASTERN SHINE RESOURCES SDN. BHD.
15 November 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncc-440-07-2025
PAC LEASE BERHAD v 1. ) INSPIRA JAYA SDN. BHD. (DAHULUNYA DIKENALI SEBAGAI TUJUAN BENA SDN. BHD.) 2. ) GREGORY AMOS YOON PENG SUM 3. ) WAN NASIR BIN WAN MUSTAFHA 4. ) YONG PENG YUEN 5. ) IHAA CAPITAL SDN. BHD. 6. ) PARAGRENE LAND BERHAD
13 November 2025
MYHC