TAN WAN CHING v LIM PENG KUN
Catchwords
Background of proceeding: (a) Witnesses (b) Bundles (c) Section 114 (g) of The Evidence Act 1950 When a matter between two parties has been adjudicated by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the parties and their privies are not permitted to litigate once more the res judicata, because the judgment becomes the truth between such parties, or in other words, the parties should accept it as the truth; res judicata pro veritate accipitur (please refer to Asia Commercial Finance (M) Bhd v Kawal Teliti Sdn Bhd [1995] 3 MLJ 189)
Practice Areas
Background of proceeding: (a) Witnesses (b) Bundles (c) Section 114 (g) of The Evidence Act 1950 When a matter between two parties has been adjudicated by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the parties and their privies are not permitted to litigate once more the res judicata, because the judgment becomes the truth between such parties, or in other words, the parties should accept it as the truth; res judicata pro veritate accipitur (please refer to Asia Commercial Finance (M) Bhd v Kawal Teliti Sdn Bhd 1995 3 MLJ 189)
Judges (1)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
TAN WAN CHING v LIM PENG KUN is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 15, 2026 (citation: pa-33-415-12-2021). The case was decided by Azizan bin Md. Arshad.
Key issues: Background of proceeding:.
What was the outcome of TAN WAN CHING v LIM PENG KUN?
TAN WAN CHING v LIM PENG KUN is a High Court decision dated January 15, 2026. The case was heard by Azizan bin Md. Arshad. See the full judgment for details.