SHERLY MORISTA
Catchwords
In Per: Tan Joo Yen (Supra), the Court holds the view that it does not fall under the phrase "where a marriage which is solemnised in Malaysia" for the purposes of the provisions of Section 107(3) of the LRA. The Court further finds that the procedure for solemnising a marriage in Malaysia is clearly delineated by Parliament as set out in Sections 22(4), (5), and (6) of the LRA. Moreover, the Court articulated the perspective that the marriage procedure in Malaysia has been instituted by Parliament in accordance with the requirements set forth in Sections 22(4), (5), and (6) of the Act.
Practice Areas
In Per: Tan Joo Yen (Supra), the Court holds the view that it does not fall under the phrase "where a marriage which is solemnised in Malaysia" for the purposes of the provisions of Section 107(3) of the LRA. The Court further finds that the procedure for solemnising a marriage in Malaysia is clearly delineated by Parliament as set out in Sections 22(4), (5), and (6) of the LRA. Moreover, the Court articulated the perspective that the marriage procedure in Malaysia has been instituted by Parliament in accordance with the requirements set forth in Sections 22(4), (5), and (6) of the Act.
Judges (1)
Parties (1)
Case Significance
SHERLY MORISTA is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated May 26, 2025 (citation: pa-33-129-04-2025). The case was decided by Azizan bin Md. Arshad.
Key issues: The Court further finds that the procedure for solemnising a marriage in Malaysia is clearly delineated by Parliament as set out in Sections 22(4), (5), and (6) of the LRA..
What was the outcome of SHERLY MORISTA?
SHERLY MORISTA is a High Court decision dated May 26, 2025. The case was heard by Azizan bin Md. Arshad. See the full judgment for details.