1. ) LEE KIAN KIONG 2. ) DESTINY CODE SDN BHD v 1. ) DATO' CHE SEOW FOON @ CHOW SEOW FOON 2. ) TAN SEE WIE 3. ) LEE KHENG SEONG 4. ) NG BOON THIAM 5. ) TENG BEE KIM 6. ) LIM POH LEE 7. ) OH SOONG TIN

pa-12a-7-06-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 17 August 2025 • PA-12A-7-06/2025

Catchwords

The Writ action does not duplicate Civil Suit 6. When pleadings show a valid cause of action and indicate legal issues requiring detailed argument, the court should not dismiss the suit. Additionally, the court must determine if relevant factual matters require witness evidence; if so, it should not dismiss the claim under O 18 r 19 of the ROC 2012.

Practice Areas

The Writ action does not duplicate Civil Suit 6. When pleadings show a valid cause of action and indicate legal issues requiring detailed argument, the court should not dismiss the suit. Additionally, the court must determine if relevant factual matters require witness evidence; if so, it should not dismiss the claim under O 18 r 19 of the ROC 2012.

Judges (1)

Azizan bin Md. Arshad Delivered

Parties (9)

DESTINY CODE Sdn Bhd Appellant Dato' Che Seow Foon @ Chow Seow Foon Respondent Lee Kheng Seong Respondent Lee Kian Kiong Appellant Lim Poh Lee Respondent Ng Boon Thiam Respondent Oh Soong Tin Respondent Tan See Wie Respondent Teng Bee Kim Respondent

Case Significance

1. ) LEE KIAN KIONG 2. ) DESTINY CODE SDN BHD v 1. ) DATO' CHE SEOW FOON @ CH... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated August 17, 2025 (citation: pa-12a-7-06-2025). The case was decided by Azizan bin Md. Arshad.

What was the outcome of 1. ) LEE KIAN KIONG 2. ) DESTINY CODE SDN BHD v 1. ) DATO' CHE SEOW FOON @ CH...?

1. ) LEE KIAN KIONG 2. ) DESTINY CODE SDN BHD v 1. ) DATO' CHE SEOW FOON @ CH... is a High Court decision dated August 17, 2025. The case was heard by Azizan bin Md. Arshad. See the full judgment for details.