Contract
829 cases · May 2017 to July 2026
Overview
Contract appears in 829 reported Malaysia judgments (2017–2026).
In this practice area
Contract collects the disputes in which the Malaysian courts construe agreements, decide whether a binding bargain was formed, and determine the consequences of a breach. The reasoning ranges across formation, interpretation, illegality, variation and remedies, and is anchored in the Contracts Act 1950 alongside the common law the courts continue to develop.
Interpretation is a persistent theme. Judgments apply established canons — construing a commercial contract as a whole, the contra proferentem approach to ambiguity, and the treatment of post-formation conduct — and consider when a variation is supported by consideration, including the practical-benefit reasoning associated with Williams v Roffey Bros. Illegality is a second major strand: the courts examine section 24 and section 26 of the Contracts Act 1950, the treatment of agreements said to be wagering or gambling contracts, and the recovery of money advanced for such purposes, as well as the recharacterisation of a purported sale as a disguised and illegal moneylending transaction.
A substantial group of cases arises from sale and purchase agreements, particularly claims for liquidated damages for the late delivery of vacant possession under statutory housing contracts, and from building and supply contracts. Others test the boundary between a contractual claim and an alternative claim in tort, or the interaction of contract with company and insolvency law where a party is wound up before quantum is assessed.
The cases are concentrated in the High Court, with appeals to the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court, where questions of law of general importance about the formation and construction of contracts are settled. As a whole the area shows how the Malaysian courts hold parties to their agreements while policing the outer limits set by illegality, want of consideration and public policy. The reader will find contract reasoning applied to commercial, property and consumer dealings alike, since the Contracts Act 1950 supplies the common language for every bargain the courts are asked to enforce.
Case Volume by Year
4 17
7 18
7 19
2 20
8 21
5 22
20 23
136 24
425 25
215 26
2017–2026
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Agreement — Sale and purchase agreement — 1st respondent claimed liquidated ascertained damages (“LAD”) against applicant for delay in delivery of vacant possession — Settlement agreement between applicant and 1st respondent — Whether settlement agreement entered — Whether settlement agreement is certain and capable of being certain — Whether settlement agreement entered prior to the occurrence of the delay of vacant possession —Whether 1st respondent estopped by settlement agreement from filing claim at the Tribunal for Homebuyers Claim 3 Unconscionability — Unequal bargaining power — Penalty clauses — Interest and late payment charges — Whether terms in a Letter of Offer and subsequent Settlement Agreement were unconscionable — Impact of prior commercial conduct and partial performance. 2 Illegality — Moneylending transaction — Sale and purchase agreements alleged to be sham — Whether agreements intended to disguise loan transaction — Whether contravened Moneylenders Act 1951 — Unlicensed moneylending — Effect of illegality — Whether agreements enforceable — Moneylenders Act 1951, ss 2, 5, 10OA, 15, 17A Contract — Illegality — Moneylending transaction — Sale and purchase agreements declared unenforceable — Effect on third-party claims — Whether plaintiff had beneficial interest in property — Moneylenders Act 1951, s 15 Contract — Privity of contract — Plaintiff not a party to sale and purchase agreement — Whether plaintiff entitled to assert rights against subsequent purchaser Contract — Sham agreements — Test — Intention of parties — Circumstantial evidence — Whether sale and purchase agreements were façade to camouflage illegal moneylending — Whether court entitled to lift veil and examine substance of transaction Appeal — Powers of appellate court — Failure of trial judge to address pleaded issue — Whether appellate court may determine issue not decided by trial court — Whether omission constitutes appealable error Equity — Beneficial interest — Whether illegal and void transaction capable of conferring equitable or beneficial rights Evidence — Presumption — Moneylenders Act 1951 — Presumption of moneylending — Burden of proof — Failure to rebut statutory presumption — Effect 2 offer and acceptance — counter offer Sale of land — whether acceptance by the purchaser is conditional Whether the inclusion of additional terms in the acceptance amounted to a counter offer Whether there is a valid contract 2 Guarantee — Guarantee Service Provider scheme under Kafalah contract — Concurrent rights of bank against customer and guarantee service provider — Corporate Guarantee’s right of subrogation and right of recourse — Whether bank entitled to recover from either or both — Whether defendant ultimately liable — Contracts Act 1950, s.77, s.78, s.79, & s.81. 2 Guarantee — Liability of guarantor — Guarantors claimed that they did not allegedly agree to guarantee the performance of the First Defendant’s obligation to pay any sums outstanding but had only promised that the First Defendant will comply with the terms of the agreement — Whether the Guarantors are discharge of their obligations — Letter of comfort 2 Development agreement — Construction — Whether agreement to be construed as a whole — Whether plaintiff established exclusive entitlement to Land Cost and judgment sum — Effect of contemporaneous documents and parties' conduct — Burden of proof. 1 Privatisation agreement — Termination — Alleged breach — Outstanding contractual payments — Counter-allegation of prior breach — Bad faith — Suitability for determination under Order 33. 1 Guarantee — Guarantors — Condition precedent — Certificate of Practical Completion (CPC) — Continuing guarantee — Construction of guarantee — Non-fulfilment of condition precedent — Main contract — KPRJ contract — Quantum — Burden of proof — Claim dismissed with costs 1 Loan agreement — Friendly loan — Cash advance — Proof of loan — Alleged advancement of RM180,000 in cash — Absence of receipts, bank statements or contemporaneous financial records — Borrower executing loan agreement and statutory declaration acknowledging receipt of money — Whether lender discharged burden of proof — Whether admissions sufficient to establish indebtedness — Evidence Act 1950, ss 17, 18, 21, 101–103. 1 Loan — Friendly loan — Cash transaction — Burden of proof — Distinction between proof of execution of loan documents and proof of actual disbursement of loan monies — Whether execution alone sufficient — Whether loan nevertheless proved through admissions and surrounding evidence. 1 Consent — Non est factum — Illiteracy or limited language proficiency — Borrower alleging inability to understand language of document — Allegation of deception — Admitted signature on loan agreement and statutory declaration — Whether consent vitiated — Whether signatory bound by signed document — Contracts Act 1950, ss 10, 14, 17–19. 1 Consideration — Loan agreement — Whether consideration proved — Cash loan — Relationship between contractual acknowledgment of receipt and proof of consideration — Contracts Act 1950, ss 2(d), 10. 1 Indemnity — Contractual indemnity under banker’s guarantee application — Bank paying beneficiary pursuant to guarantee — Recovery of amount paid — Alternative claim in unjust enrichment and restitution. 1 Misrepresentation — Fraud — Sale and purchase of land — Allegation that vendor represented bungalow stood wholly on land conveyed — Purchaser subsequently discovering structure straddled adjoining lot retained by vendor — Whether allegations of fraud and misrepresentation required proof notwithstanding defendant’s default — Evidence Act 1950. 1 Agreed damages — Liquidated damages clause — Default judgment — Whether agreed damages recoverable as liquidated demand — Discrepancy between pleaded amount and amount claimed in prayer — Requirement that stipulated sum constitute reasonable compensation — Contracts Act 1950, s 75. 1 Rescission — Restitution — Recovery of purchase price — Re-conveyance of land — Claim for agreed damages in addition to restitutionary relief — Whether claim raised issue of double recovery — Contracts Act 1950, ss 65, 66. 1 Recovery of debt — Supply of newspapers — Liability under vendor agreement and MEP arrangement — Proof of indebtedness by documentary evidence — Appeal against findings of fact — Whether appellate intervention warranted 1 Incorporation by reference — Professional services agreement — Effect of general incorporation clause and specific reference to individual condition within incorporated terms 1 Guarantee — Share sale transaction — Deed of Profit Guarantee and Escrow — Alleged substitution and release of guarantor — Whether defendant discharged from obligations under profit guarantee by December 2022 arrangements involving third party guarantor 1
+ 134 more
Agreement — Sale and purchase agreement — 1st respondent claimed liquidated ascertained damages (“LAD”) against applicant for delay in delivery of vacant possession — Settlement agreement between applicant and 1st respondent — Whether settlement agreement entered — Whether settlement agreement is certain and capable of being certain — Whether settlement agreement entered prior to the occurrence of the delay of vacant possession —Whether 1st respondent estopped by settlement agreement from filing claim at the Tribunal for Homebuyers Claim 3 cases
wa-25-228-08-2023 RAKAN SETIA HOUSING SDN. BHD. v 1. ) MOHAMAD SYAHRULFITRI BIN MOHD RIDZWAN 2. ) TRIBUNAL TUNTUTAN PEMBELI RUMAH
3 December 2024
wa-25-278-09-2023 RAKAN SETIA HOUSING SDN. BHD. v 1. ) MOHD ADI FIRDAUS BIN MAT SAAD 2. ) TRIBUNAL TUNTUTAN PEMBELI RUMAH
3 December 2024
wa-25-287-09-2023 RAKAN SETIA HOUSING SDN. BHD. v 1. ) MOHD RAFIQ BIN CHE ANI 2. ) TRIBUNAL TUNTUTAN PEMBELI RUMAH
3 December 2024
Unconscionability — Unequal bargaining power — Penalty clauses — Interest and late payment charges — Whether terms in a Letter of Offer and subsequent Settlement Agreement were unconscionable — Impact of prior commercial conduct and partial performance. 2 cases
ba-12ancc-47-10-2025 1. ) ST HEALTHCARE GROUP SDN. BHD. 2. ) NORAISHAH BINTI ABDUL HALIM 3. ) SAFARUDIN BIN TAMBI v MODALKU VENTURES SDN. BHD.
13 April 2026
ba-12ancc-48-10-2025 1. ) ST HEALTHCARE GROUP SDN. BHD. 2. ) NORAISHAH BINTI ABDUL HALIM 3. ) SAFARUDIN BIN TAMBI v MODALKU VENTURES SDN. BHD.
13 April 2026
Illegality — Moneylending transaction — Sale and purchase agreements alleged to be sham — Whether agreements intended to disguise loan transaction — Whether contravened Moneylenders Act 1951 — Unlicensed moneylending — Effect of illegality — Whether agreements enforceable — Moneylenders Act 1951, ss 2, 5, 10OA, 15, 17A Contract — Illegality — Moneylending transaction — Sale and purchase agreements declared unenforceable — Effect on third-party claims — Whether plaintiff had beneficial interest in property — Moneylenders Act 1951, s 15 Contract — Privity of contract — Plaintiff not a party to sale and purchase agreement — Whether plaintiff entitled to assert rights against subsequent purchaser Contract — Sham agreements — Test — Intention of parties — Circumstantial evidence — Whether sale and purchase agreements were façade to camouflage illegal moneylending — Whether court entitled to lift veil and examine substance of transaction Appeal — Powers of appellate court — Failure of trial judge to address pleaded issue — Whether appellate court may determine issue not decided by trial court — Whether omission constitutes appealable error Equity — Beneficial interest — Whether illegal and void transaction capable of conferring equitable or beneficial rights Evidence — Presumption — Moneylenders Act 1951 — Presumption of moneylending — Burden of proof — Failure to rebut statutory presumption — Effect 2 cases
offer and acceptance — counter offer Sale of land — whether acceptance by the purchaser is conditional Whether the inclusion of additional terms in the acceptance amounted to a counter offer Whether there is a valid contract 2 cases
aa-22ncvc-74-10-2020 CAHAYA WIBAWA SDN.BHD v DEWAN PERNIAGAAN INDIA PERAK (Perak Indian Chamber of Commerce) dan diwakili oleh Majlis atau pemegang-pemegang yang bernama 1.RAVISANKAR A/L BALASUBRAMANIAM Pengurusi 2.HAJI SULTAN ABDUL KHADER A/L SHAIK MOHAMED-Timbalan Pengerusi 3. ASOKAN A/L YATHIRAJU-Setiausaha 4.SARAVANABAWAN MATHIALAGAN-Penolong Setiausaha 5.MUNIAMMAL A/P SUPPIAH CHETTIAR-Bendahari 6.GANESAN A/L SUBRAMANIAM-Ahli J/kuasa 7.MANIMARAN A/L EKAMPARAM -Ahli J/Kuasa 8.YEGAMBARAM AM SUPPIAH PILLAY-Ahli ...
22 September 2025
aa-24ncvc-118-03-2022 SULTAN ABDUL KHADER A/L SHAIK MOHAMED (SEBAGAI TIMBALAN PENGERUSI DEWAN PERNIAGAAN INDIA PERAK DAHULUNYA DIKENALI SEBAGAI PERAK INDIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE) v CAHAYA WIBAWA SDN. BHD.
22 September 2025
Guarantee — Guarantee Service Provider scheme under Kafalah contract — Concurrent rights of bank against customer and guarantee service provider — Corporate Guarantee’s right of subrogation and right of recourse — Whether bank entitled to recover from either or both — Whether defendant ultimately liable — Contracts Act 1950, s.77, s.78, s.79, & s.81. 2 cases
Guarantee — Liability of guarantor — Guarantors claimed that they did not allegedly agree to guarantee the performance of the First Defendant’s obligation to pay any sums outstanding but had only promised that the First Defendant will comply with the terms of the agreement — Whether the Guarantors are discharge of their obligations — Letter of comfort 2 cases
Development agreement — Construction — Whether agreement to be construed as a whole — Whether plaintiff established exclusive entitlement to Land Cost and judgment sum — Effect of contemporaneous documents and parties' conduct — Burden of proof. 1 case
Privatisation agreement — Termination — Alleged breach — Outstanding contractual payments — Counter-allegation of prior breach — Bad faith — Suitability for determination under Order 33. 1 case
Guarantee — Guarantors — Condition precedent — Certificate of Practical Completion (CPC) — Continuing guarantee — Construction of guarantee — Non-fulfilment of condition precedent — Main contract — KPRJ contract — Quantum — Burden of proof — Claim dismissed with costs 1 case
Loan agreement — Friendly loan — Cash advance — Proof of loan — Alleged advancement of RM180,000 in cash — Absence of receipts, bank statements or contemporaneous financial records — Borrower executing loan agreement and statutory declaration acknowledging receipt of money — Whether lender discharged burden of proof — Whether admissions sufficient to establish indebtedness — Evidence Act 1950, ss 17, 18, 21, 101–103. 1 case
Loan — Friendly loan — Cash transaction — Burden of proof — Distinction between proof of execution of loan documents and proof of actual disbursement of loan monies — Whether execution alone sufficient — Whether loan nevertheless proved through admissions and surrounding evidence. 1 case
Consent — Non est factum — Illiteracy or limited language proficiency — Borrower alleging inability to understand language of document — Allegation of deception — Admitted signature on loan agreement and statutory declaration — Whether consent vitiated — Whether signatory bound by signed document — Contracts Act 1950, ss 10, 14, 17–19. 1 case
Consideration — Loan agreement — Whether consideration proved — Cash loan — Relationship between contractual acknowledgment of receipt and proof of consideration — Contracts Act 1950, ss 2(d), 10. 1 case
Indemnity — Contractual indemnity under banker’s guarantee application — Bank paying beneficiary pursuant to guarantee — Recovery of amount paid — Alternative claim in unjust enrichment and restitution. 1 case
Misrepresentation — Fraud — Sale and purchase of land — Allegation that vendor represented bungalow stood wholly on land conveyed — Purchaser subsequently discovering structure straddled adjoining lot retained by vendor — Whether allegations of fraud and misrepresentation required proof notwithstanding defendant’s default — Evidence Act 1950. 1 case
Agreed damages — Liquidated damages clause — Default judgment — Whether agreed damages recoverable as liquidated demand — Discrepancy between pleaded amount and amount claimed in prayer — Requirement that stipulated sum constitute reasonable compensation — Contracts Act 1950, s 75. 1 case
Rescission — Restitution — Recovery of purchase price — Re-conveyance of land — Claim for agreed damages in addition to restitutionary relief — Whether claim raised issue of double recovery — Contracts Act 1950, ss 65, 66. 1 case
Recovery of debt — Supply of newspapers — Liability under vendor agreement and MEP arrangement — Proof of indebtedness by documentary evidence — Appeal against findings of fact — Whether appellate intervention warranted 1 case
Incorporation by reference — Professional services agreement — Effect of general incorporation clause and specific reference to individual condition within incorporated terms 1 case
Release — Construction of contractual documents — Whether plaintiff’s letter dated 21 December 2022 constituted complete and unconditional release — Whether release dependent upon fulfilment or deemed fulfilment of conditions in “Agreement to Release PG” 1 case
Waiver and remission — Section 64 Contracts Act 1950 — Whether promisee may dispense with contractual performance without consideration — Whether alleged dispensation unconditional or conditional upon disputed matters — Whether waiver by conduct capable of summary determination on affidavit evidence 1 case
Sale of goods — Payment — Pay-when-paid clause — Whether payment obligation contingent upon prior payment by Government — Whether unsigned conditional letter of appointment formed binding agreement — Whether subsequent purchase orders with express payment terms superseded alleged contingent arrangement — Whether defence of prematurity established 1 case
Interest — Late payment interest — Whether plaintiff entitled to contractual late payment interest stated in invoices — Whether failure to previously enforce strict payment timelines constituted waiver — Whether defendants had notice of interest clause 1 case
Novation — Tenancy agreement — Alleged transfer of tenant’s obligations to third party developer by novation agreement — Whether landlords consented to novation — Requirement of consent of all parties — Whether acceptance of rent from third party constituted consent to substitution of obligor — Contracts Act 1950, s 63 1 case
Assignment and novation — Requirement of notice under tenancy agreement — Whether absence of written notice under contractual clause precluded finding of novation — Whether novation established on affidavit evidence alone 1 case
Oral contract — Ship repair works — Claim for work done — Whether additional works fell within original contract sum or were separately chargeable — Whether contractor entitled to payment for additional works requested and accepted by employer — Contracts Act 1950, s 71 1 case
Key Statutes
Contracts Act 1950 (Cap 136)
cited in 175 cases Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)
cited in 146 cases Rules of Court 2012
cited in 136 cases Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)
cited in 44 cases National Land Code (Cap 828)
cited in 30 cases Limitation Act 1953 (Cap 254)
cited in 27 cases Courts of Judicature Act 1964
cited in 24 cases Specific Relief Act 1950 (Cap 137)
cited in 21 cases Evidence Act
cited in 13 cases Contracts Act
cited in 12 cases
cited in 9 cases
Civil Law Act 1956
cited in 8 cases Subordinate Courts Act 1948 (Cap 92)
cited in 8 cases Penal Code (Cap 574)
cited in 7 cases Federal Constitution
cited in 7 cases Court Distribution
Key People & Firms
Top Judges
Elaine Yap Chin Gaik 38 Atan Mustaffa Yussof Ahmad 30 John Lee Kien How @ Mohammad Johan Lee 26 Raja Segaran a/l S.krishnan 26 Noradura binti Hamzah 25 Yusrin Faidz bin Yusoff 21 Moh Kok Wai 20 Quay Chew Soon 19 Lim Chong Fong 19 Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat 19 Manira binti Mohd Nor 15 Ahmad Kamal bin Md. Shahid 15 Anand Ponnudurai 15 Hazizah binti Kassim 15 Roz Mawar binti Rozain 14
Top Firms
Azmi & Associates 10 Skrine 9 Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledhill 9 Justin Voon Chooi & Wing 7 Gunaseelan & Associates 7 Shearn Delamore & Co. 7 Thomas Philip 6 Cheang & Ariff 6 Cheah Teh & Su 5 Enho Grace & Partners 5 Shaikh David & Co 5 Harold & Lam Partnership 5 G.K. Sritharan & Co 5 Yeoh Shim Siow & Lay Kuan 5 Andrew Davis & Co. 5
How many Contract cases are reported in Malaysia courts?
829 reported Malaysia judgments (2017–2026) involve Contract.
What questions does the Contract area address?
It addresses whether a binding agreement was formed, how its terms should be construed, whether it is affected by illegality or want of consideration, and what follows from a breach. The Contracts Act 1950 supplies the statutory framework, and the judgments apply and develop the common law of interpretation, variation and remedies alongside it.
How do the courts handle illegal or gambling-related contracts?
The judgments examine section 24 and section 26 of the Contracts Act 1950, the status of wagering and gambling agreements, and the recovery of money advanced for such purposes. A related line recharacterises a transaction dressed up as a sale and purchase as a disguised and illegal moneylending arrangement, which affects whether the agreement is enforceable at all.
What types of contracts recur most in the collection?
Sale and purchase agreements are prominent, especially claims for liquidated damages for late delivery of vacant possession under statutory housing contracts, together with building, supply and facility agreements. Several judgments also consider how a contract claim interacts with an alternative claim in tort or with company and insolvency proceedings.
Cases
Page 21 of 34wa-22ncc-418-08-2022
CHAN KIM HU v SAFZ AUTO SDN. BHD.
8 May 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncvc-59-02-2021
RENUGA A/P VARATBARAJU menyaman sebagai Wasi dan Pemegang Amanah Harta Pusaka Varatbaraju A/L Munusamy, simati v LIBRA ATLANTIC SDN. BHD
8 May 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncvc-837-12-2020
PORATHA CORPORATION SDN.BHD. v DSCAFF ENGINEERING SDN.BHD.
8 May 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncc-623-08-2023
WIJADI RESOURCES SDN BHD v 1. ) MEGA SYSTEM (M) SDN BHD 2. ) SELANGOR INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION SDN BHD 3. ) Perbadanan Kemajuan Negeri Selangor (PKNS) 4. ) DATUK ZAKARIA BIN MUHD
7 May 2025
MYHC
ka-22ncvc-10-02-2020
Lew Wan Nee v Lim Ah Hock
6 May 2025
MYHC
ka-22ncvc-24-03-2021
HOSNA REALTY SDN. BHD. v ADAP 4ORTY GLOBAL SDN. BHD.
6 May 2025
MYHC
b-02ncvcw-352-03-2024
TECT HUAT DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD v 1. ) GOH CHENG HUAT 2. ) GOH CHENG HUAY 3. ) GOH CHING CHAI 4. ) GOH CHING ENG 5. ) GOH CHING SEONG
4 May 2025
MYCOA
b-02ncvcw-353-03-2024
1. ) GOH CHENG HUAT 2. ) GOH CHENG HUAY 3. ) GOH CHING CHAI 4. ) GOH CHING ENG 5. ) GOH CHING SEONG v TECT HUAT DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD
4 May 2025
MYCOA
ba-22ncc-41-04-2021
ASIA VICTOR (M) SDN BHD v 1. ) RHYTHM AGENCIES SDN BHD 2. ) Kashminder Singh A/l Josbir Singh (Defendan Pertama Dalam Tuntutan Balas) 3. ) PETROBANQ HOLDING SDN BHD (DEFENDAN KETIGA DALAM TUNTUTAN BALAS)
4 May 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncc-87-02-2024
HSC Medical Inc. v 1. ) ConserveNRG Sdn. Bhd. 2. ) Vivek G. Dharkar 3. ) M Ramanathan a/l S.M. Meyyappan PIHAK TERKILAN Ng Yeen Seen
4 May 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncvc-506-07-2021
MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD v WONG WEI PIN
1 May 2025
MYHC
ma-22ncvc-2-01-2019
Marjan Petrovski v 1. ) Datuk Seri Utama IR Haji Idris bin Hj Haron 2. ) Datuk Wira Mohd Yusoff bin Hj Mahadi 3. ) Ahmad Roslee bin Hamzah 4. ) Datuk Hj Fadzil bin A. Bakar 5. ) Khairi Anuar bin Ahmad 6. ) Tn Hj Ramli bin Mohd Ali 7. ) Noor Azman bin Hj. Rahman 8. ) Razak bin Abu Hassan 9. ) Shamsuddin bin Hassan 10. ) A. Subramaniam 11. ) Tan Ching Yang 12. ) S Pathy 13. ) Nazri bin Abu Bakar 14. ) Mohd Saiful bin Mat Sapri 15. ) Bakri bin Neemat
29 April 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncvc-73-02-2024
ALFRED CHUA CHENG JUN v JAKS ISLAND CIRCLE SDN. BHD. (Dalam Likuidasi)
29 April 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncvc-74-02-2024
TAY YUAN YAN (mendakwa melalui TAY KHIM SENG (No. K/P. 601107016285) sebagai Pemegang Surat Kuasa Wakil) v JAKS ISLAND CIRCLE SDN BHD (Dalam Likuidasi)
29 April 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncvc-755-11-2021
DETIK TIMUR SDN BHD v MEGA WANGSA SDN BHD
29 April 2025
MYHC
ka-22ncc-7-06-2022
WAN BADARUDDIN BIN CHE WAN BASOR ALI v 1. ) CIMB BANK BERHAD 2. ) Yang Teramat Mulia Dato' Seri Diraja Tan Sri Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz Binti Tuanku Abdul Halim Mu'adzam Shah
28 April 2025
MYHC
ja-31ncvc-417-10-2018
PANG SHYIAN JUANG
24 April 2025
MYHC
pa-22ncc-68-10-2024
Affin Bank Berhad v 1. ) Lion Golf Entertainment Sdn Bhd (dahulunya dikenali sebagai Cosmic Animation Entertainment Sdn Bhd) 2. ) H'ng Ban Choon 3. ) Loh Woei Shan
24 April 2025
MYHC
ba-12bncvc-35-06-2024
TAN CHEE HOE v KALIAMAH A/P SUBRAMANIAM
22 April 2025
MYHC
ba-22ncvc-276-07-2022
NG SOW LENG v Mooi Mun Yin [Bertindak Sebagai Pentadbir Yang Dilantik Melalui Surat Kuasa Mentadbir Bawah Saman Pemula No: Ba-31ncvc-671-04/2025 Bagi Harta Pusaka, Mooi Chee Meng (No. K/p: 750603-08-5481) Defendan Dalam Tindakan Asal] PIHAK TERKILAN Tetuan Yeong Khoo & Partners
22 April 2025
MYHC
bl-22ncc-17-11-2022
ASIA INTERGRAL RESOURCES SDN BHD v DTN RESOURCES SDN BHD
22 April 2025
MYHC
bl-22ncvc-43-10-2023
DTN RESOURCES SDN. BHD. v ASIA INTEGRAL RESOURCES SDN. BHD.
22 April 2025
MYHC
pa-22ncc-79-11-2024
FSK MARKETING SDN. BHD. v CONCRETE ENGINEERING PRODUCTS BERHAD
22 April 2025
MYHC
pa-22ncvc-33-02-2020
Parimala Devi A/p Thangamoney v Theyagarajan A/l Muniandy
22 April 2025
MYHC
pa-22ncvc-49-04-2024
LATEX FORM SDN BHD v ICONIC MEDICARE SDN BHD
21 April 2025
MYHC