S
Skrine
3 cases · 5 lawyers
Contact Information
📍 LEVEL 8, WISMA UOA DAMANSARA, 50 JALAN DUNGUN, DAMANSARA HEIGHTS
📠 03-20943211
About Skrine
Skrine has appeared in 3 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning September 2024 to February 2026. Case appearances span the Court of Appeal (2), Federal Court (1). Role breakdown: counsel for respondent (3). The firm is located at LEVEL 8, WISMA UOA DAMANSARA, 50 JALAN DUNGUN, DAMANSARA HEIGHTS, phone: 03-20813999, email: skrine@skrine.com.
3
Cases
5
Lawyers (in cases)
3
Appearances
How many cases has Skrine handled?
Skrine has appeared in 3 published judgments from September 2024 to February 2026. Appearances span the Court of Appeal (2), Federal Court (1).
Practice Areas (from case appearances)
Validity of supplemental agreement under contract law. Extrinsic evidence in proving considerations. Practical benefit test. Variations or contractual agreements. Contractual estoppel and variations agreements. 1 This is an appeal by the Appellant / Plaintiff against the decision of the High Court dated 24.09.2024 in dismissing the Plaintiff’s application with costs of RM7,000.00 vide Enclosure 311 to stay the High Court Judgment dated 26.06.2024 pending the disposal of the Appellant’s Civil Appeal No. P-02(NCvC)(W)-1305-07/2024 1 legal questions concerning the validity of a bifurcated management structure in a mixed development under the Building and Common Property (Maintenance and Management) Act 2007 (“BCPA 2007”) and the Strata Management Act 2013 (“SMA 2013”). 1 whether the developer and the commercial parcel owners were legally entitled to institute a regime of separate management and maintenance of the commercial parcels and the common property within the commercial component, thereby confining the Joint Management Body (“JMB”) to the management of only the residential parcels and the common property appurtenant thereto. 1 Court to determine the consequences of such arrangements should the resolutions passed at the first annual general meeting be found ultra vires and void, specifically, whether the JMB, is entitled to demand the surrender and handover of the commercial common property, and to recover arrears of maintenance charges and sinking fund contributions retrospectively from the developer’s management period through to the present JMB management period. 1 whether residential parcel owners, who had paid charges imposed pursuant to the impugned resolutions, may seek refunds of the sums paid, and whether the Court may instead order that such payments be credited or adjusted against lawfully determined charges to be fixed at a proper general meeting to be convened by the JMB. 1 statutory framework governing common property, the indivisibility of management responsibilities, and the legal effect of resolutions that purport to depart from the scheme mandated by the BCPA 2007 and SMA 2013. 1
Lawyers (5)
Cases (3)
p-02ncvcw-1305-07-2024 MYCOA
BADAN PENGURUSAN BERSAMA GURNEY PARAGON RESIDENTIAL v 1. ) HUNZA PROPERTIES (GURNEY) SDN BHD 2. ) HUNZA PROPERTIES (PENANG) SDN BHD 3. ) BEACHFRONT SERVICES SDN BHD
2 February 2026
p-01imncvc-632-10-2024 MYCOA
BADAN PENGURUSAN BERSAMA GURNEY PARAGON RESIDENTIAL v 1. ) HUNZA PROPERTIES (GURNEY) SDN BHD 2. ) HUNZA PROPERTIES (PENANG) SDN BHD 3. ) BEACHFRONT SERVICES SDN BHD
17 July 2025
02f-7-04-2024b MYFC
KUALA DIMENSI SDN BHD v PORT KELANG AUTHORITY
1 September 2024