ACESIDE (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD. v 1. ) SAINI BIN ALI 2. ) ZAINAL ABIDIN BIN AHMAD

ja-22ncvc-25-02-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 18 June 2026 • JA-22NCvC-25-02/2022 • 27 min read
4 cases cited (0 SG, 4 foreign)

Outcome

For these reasons, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed with costs of RM100,000.00 subject to the allocatur.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (ja-22ncvc-25-02-2022). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Contract – Guarantee – Guarantors – Condition precedent – Certificate of Practical Completion (CPC) – Continuing guarantee – Construction of guarantee – Non-fulfilment of condition precedent – Main contract – KPRJ contract – Quantum – Burden of proof – Claim dismissed with costs

Practice Areas

Contract Criminal Procedure

Judges (1)

Noradura binti Hamzah Delivered

Counsel (5)

K. Siladass & Partners Firm William Leong & Co. Firm Mandave Singh Gill Counsel Plaintiff Nurrul Nadia binti Norrizan Counsel Plaintiff William Leong Jee Keen Counsel Defendant

Parties (3)

ACESIDE Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Saini bin Ali Defendant Zainal Abidin bin Ahmad Defendant

Statutes Cited

Contracts Act 1950 (Cap 136)
s 92

Cases Cited (4)

UK (1)
[1971] 3 All ER 237
MY (3)
[2010] 1 MLJ 597 [2015] 7 MLJ 445 [2016] 1 MLJ 464

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-22ncvc-25-02-2022)