K

Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James

J 16 cases

About J Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James

Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James has been involved in 16 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning November 2022 to November 2025. These cases are from the High Court (16 cases). Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James served as the delivering judge in 16 of these cases.

Key areas of jurisprudence include 7. Ng Hoo Kui (supra) propounded that the primary “plainly wrong” principle includes the following not-exhaustive elaborative tenets, and I apply them here— (2 cases), (2) This phrase of the “lack of judicial appreciation of the evidence” encompasses these three errors— (2 cases), (i) critical factual finding which has no basis in evidence (that is, findings not based on the evidence); (2 cases). Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James holds the designation of Dato'.

16

Total Cases

16

Delivered

0

Sat On (Coram)

How many cases has Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James been involved in?

Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James has been involved in 16 published judgments from November 2022 to November 2025, serving as the delivering judge in 16 of them. Cases span the High Court (16 cases).

What types of cases does Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James typically handle?

Based on 16 published judgments, Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James's most common case types include 7. Ng Hoo Kui (supra) propounded that the primary “plainly wrong” principle includes the following not-exhaustive elaborative tenets, and I apply them here— (2 cases) and (2) This phrase of the “lack of judicial appreciation of the evidence” encompasses these three errors— (2 cases).

Practice Areas

6. Our Federal Court, in Ng Hoo Kui & Anor v Wendy Tan Lee Peng (administratrix for the estate of Tan Ewe Kwang, deceased) & Ors 2020 12 MLJ 67 (FC); 2020 8 AMR 227; 2020 10 CLJ 1; 2020 6 MLRA 193, comprehensively expounded the genesis of the “plainly wrong” principle, through its development over the years, into its current meaning. 2 7. Ng Hoo Kui (supra) propounded that the primary “plainly wrong” principle includes the following not-exhaustive elaborative tenets, and I apply them here— 2 (2) This phrase of the “lack of judicial appreciation of the evidence” encompasses these three errors— 2 (i) critical factual finding which has no basis in evidence (that is, findings not based on the evidence); 2 (ii) demonstrable misunderstanding of the relevant evidence (that is, misunderstanding the evidence); 2 (iii) demonstrable failure to consider the relevant evidence (that is, failure to consider the evidence). 2 1. The Defendant is a politician. He held a press conference. He invited the media to come to his press conference. He talked about the Plaintiff. P is a well-known politician. A press statement about the press conference was emailed out to various persons in the media. 2 2. A media journalist attended the press conference. She wrote an article about what D said at the press conference. It was published in both print and online forms. 2

Cases Delivered (16)

wa-24ncvc-4826-10-2023 MYHC

BADAN PENGURUSAN BERSAMA TASIK HEIGHTS APARTMENT v ASM DEVELOPMENT SDN. BHD.

16 November 2025

wa-12ancvc-134-07-2024 MYHC

Tan Si Hai @ Tan Si Yen v 1. ) Liow Keng Luan 2. ) Tan Shing Yi

10 November 2025

pa-22ncvc-60-03-2021 MYHC

1. ) MARK SAW KHAY LIANG 2. ) CHARMAINE SAW CHIN PUAY v ANDREW SAW KHAY CHI

3 November 2025

wa-22ncvc-498-07-2024 MYHC

SIGNATURE CABINET SDN BHD v 1. ) LIM KENG HENG 2. ) MOHAMED IZHAM BIN HAMZAH 3. ) ALIGAN DESIGN SDN BHD 4. ) ALIGAN HOLDINGS SDN BHD 5. ) TULUS CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD 6. ) JAYA PRAKASH A/L MUNIANDY

17 September 2025

pa-22ncvc-180-11-2021 MYHC

1. ) DATO' K. KUMARAENDRAN 2. ) DEVKUMAR A/L K. KUMARAENDRAN v 1. ) ALBERT A/L ANTONI TASS 2. ) Selvaraja Namchivayam

pa-12b-21-09-2021 MYHC

TEH KEAN HOOI v 1. ) SIANG HENG PLASTIC WARE SDN BHD 2. ) TEOH BOON THONG

pa-12b-26-12-2022 MYHC

MINDDIOS BERHAD v TING CHIN SIONG

pa-28ncc-114-09-2023 MYHC

LOO BEE ENG v 1. ) WINNERS ALUMINIUM & GLASS SDN BHD 2. ) PAN KEE MUN 3. ) PHANG KA TING 4. ) LIM TECK SENG 5. ) LEE CHOON CHIN

pa-23ncvc-1-01-2021 MYHC

LIM GUAN ENG v OH TONG KEONG

pa-23ncvc-2-01-2021 MYHC

LIM GUAN ENG v THE CHINA PRESS BERHAD

pa-28pw-28-07-2024 MYHC

Jabatan Insolvensi Malaysia v Kuik Sian Ping

pa-22ncvc-211-11-2020 MYHC

RAVENDRAN A/L KALANGIAM v ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY (M) BERHAD

24 February 2025

pa-28ncc-140-12-2023 MYHC

SIM SOON CONSTRUCTION & TRADING v NOBLE ENERGY CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD

6 February 2025

pa-25-21-04-2021 MYHC

Sime Darby Plantation Berhad v 1. ) PENGARAH TANAH DAN GALIAN PULAU PINANG 2. ) Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Seberang Perai Selatan 3. ) PENANG DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 4. ) Kerajaan Negeri Pulau Pinang

22 January 2025

pa-28pw-30-08-2023 MYHC

Khor Yong Yong (Liquidator Of Shigen Polycolor Sdn. Bhd. (In Liquidation) [Company No: 200101031179 (566938-x)] v 1. ) TAN KHENG GUAN 2. ) CHU KOK KHING 3. ) EE GENG CHOON

19 January 2025

2-611-2010 MYHC

UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA v 1. ) MOKHTAR BIN AWANG [NO. K/P: A1937673 (lama)/710710-11-5547 (baru)] 2. ) KU SHAARI BIN KU SAAD [NO. K/P: 3380300 (lama)/421020-02-5375 (baru)] 3. ) AHMAD FAUZI BIN RAMLI [NO. K/P: 6785651 (lama)/620710-11-5361 (baru)]

7 November 2022