SIM SOON CONSTRUCTION & TRADING v NOBLE ENERGY CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD
Catchwords
1. The winding up Petition filed on the grounds that the Respondent is “unable to pay its debts” under section 465(1)(e) of the Companies Act 2016 (CA) and that “it is just and equitable” for R to be wound up under section 465(1)(h) of the CA. 2. The winding up Petition is not premised on a judgment debt. 3. Should this winding up Petition be allowed?
Practice Areas
1. The winding up Petition filed on the grounds that the Respondent is “unable to pay its debts” under section 465(1)(e) of the Companies Act 2016 (CA) and that “it is just and equitable” for R to be wound up under section 465(1)(h) of the CA. 2. The winding up Petition is not premised on a judgment debt. 3. Should this winding up Petition be allowed?
Judges (1)
Case Significance
SIM SOON CONSTRUCTION & TRADING v NOBLE ENERGY CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated February 6, 2025 (citation: pa-28ncc-140-12-2023). The case was decided by Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James.
Key issues: 2. The winding up Petition is not premised on a judgment debt..
What was the outcome of SIM SOON CONSTRUCTION & TRADING v NOBLE ENERGY CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD?
SIM SOON CONSTRUCTION & TRADING v NOBLE ENERGY CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated February 6, 2025. The case was heard by Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James. See the full judgment for details.