RAVENDRAN A/L KALANGIAM v ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY (M) BERHAD
Catchwords
1. D (insurer), by the provision of section 96(3) of the Road Transport Act 1987 (RTA), applied for a section 96(3) declaratory order to declare that the contract (policy) of insurance between D and the rider and owner of the motorcycle was void and unenforceable. 2. Plaintiff filed suit to challenge the validity of the section 96(3) Declaratory Order, on the ground of fraud (on the part of the D (insurer). 3. Should the section 98(3) declaratory order be set aside or should it be sustained?
Practice Areas
1. D (insurer), by the provision of section 96(3) of the Road Transport Act 1987 (RTA), applied for a section 96(3) declaratory order to declare that the contract (policy) of insurance between D and the rider and owner of the motorcycle was void and unenforceable. 2. Plaintiff filed suit to challenge the validity of the section 96(3) Declaratory Order, on the ground of fraud (on the part of the D (insurer). 3. Should the section 98(3) declaratory order be set aside or should it be sustained?
Judges (1)
Case Significance
RAVENDRAN A/L KALANGIAM v ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY (M) BERHAD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated February 24, 2025 (citation: pa-22ncvc-211-11-2020). The case was decided by Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James.
Key issues: 2. Plaintiff filed suit to challenge the validity of the section 96(3) Declaratory Order, on the ground of fraud (on the part of the D (insurer)..
What was the outcome of RAVENDRAN A/L KALANGIAM v ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY (M) BERHAD?
RAVENDRAN A/L KALANGIAM v ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY (M) BERHAD is a High Court decision dated February 24, 2025. The case was heard by Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James. See the full judgment for details.