LOO BEE ENG v 1. ) WINNERS ALUMINIUM & GLASS SDN BHD 2. ) PAN KEE MUN 3. ) PHANG KA TING 4. ) LIM TECK SENG 5. ) LEE CHOON CHIN
Catchwords
1. The Petitioner’s (P) petitions to wind-up the company: on two grounds— (1) that the Company’s directors have acted in the affairs of the Company in their own interests rather than in the interests of the members as a whole, or acted in any other manner which appears to be “unfair or unjust” to members; and (2) under paragraph (h): where the Court is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the Company be wound-up. 2. The first ground has to do with the conduct of the directors. The questions to consider are—in the decisions made for the Company, have the directors acted in their own interests rather than in the members’ (shareholders’) interests? Or have they acted in any manner that “appears” to be “unfair and unjust” to the members? 3. The second ground has to do with the Ebrahimi-type of winding-up—that it is “just and equitable” to wind-up the Company.
Practice Areas
1. The Petitioner’s (P) petitions to wind-up the company: on two grounds— (1) that the Company’s directors have acted in the affairs of the Company in their own interests rather than in the interests of the members as a whole, or acted in any other manner which appears to be “unfair or unjust” to members; and (2) under paragraph (h): where the Court is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the Company be wound-up. 2. The first ground has to do with the conduct of the directors. The questions to consider are—in the decisions made for the Company, have the directors acted in their own interests rather than in the members’ (shareholders’) interests? Or have they acted in any manner that “appears” to be “unfair and unjust” to the members? 3. The second ground has to do with the Ebrahimi-type of winding-up—that it is “just and equitable” to wind-up the Company.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
LOO BEE ENG v 1. ) WINNERS ALUMINIUM & GLASS SDN BHD 2. ) PAN KEE MUN 3. ) PH... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated May 27, 2025 (citation: pa-28ncc-114-09-2023). The case was decided by Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James.
Key issues: 3. The second ground has to do with the Ebrahimi-type of winding-up—that it is “just and equitable” to wind-up the Company..
What was the outcome of LOO BEE ENG v 1. ) WINNERS ALUMINIUM & GLASS SDN BHD 2. ) PAN KEE MUN 3. ) PH...?
LOO BEE ENG v 1. ) WINNERS ALUMINIUM & GLASS SDN BHD 2. ) PAN KEE MUN 3. ) PH... is a High Court decision dated May 27, 2025. The case was heard by Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James. See the full judgment for details.