A

Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz

J 11 cases

About J Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz

Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz has been involved in 11 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning January 2025 to March 2025. These cases are from the High Court (11 cases). Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz served as the delivering judge in 11 of these cases.

Key areas of jurisprudence include Application in Enclosure 1 to be placed under Judicial Management (“JM”) pursuant to section 465 of the Companies Act 2016 (“CA 2016”). (1 cases), Petition to wind up the Respondent pursuant to section 465 (1) ( e) of the Companies Act 2016 (1 cases), Petition to wind up the Respondent pursuant to section 465(1)(e) read with section 466(1)(a) of the Companies Act 2016 (“CA 2016”). (1 cases).

11
Total Cases
11
Delivered
0
Sat On (Coram)

How many cases has Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz been involved in?

Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz has been involved in 11 published judgments from January 2025 to March 2025, serving as the delivering judge in 11 of them. Cases span the High Court (11 cases).

What types of cases does Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz typically handle?

Based on 11 published judgments, Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz's most common case types include Application in Enclosure 1 to be placed under Judicial Management (“JM”) pursuant to section 465 of the Companies Act 2016 (“CA 2016”). (1 cases) and Petition to wind up the Respondent pursuant to section 465 (1) ( e) of the Companies Act 2016 (1 cases).

Practice Areas

The First Plaintiff’s claim of infringement of its industrial design by the Defendant. Whether the Plaintiff has successfully established “the eye-appeal” of its Industrial Design in the finished product. 1 The claim by the Plaintiff against the Defendant for damages arising from a fire on a Yacht belonging to the Defendant. The Plaintiff alleged that the fire was caused by negligence on the part of the Defendant or it’s contractor in the course of performing the works. 1 Application in Enclosure 1 to be placed under Judicial Management (“JM”) pursuant to section 465 of the Companies Act 2016 (“CA 2016”). 1 Petition to wind-up the Respondent pursuant to section 465(1)(f) and (h) of the Companies Act 2016. Petitioner allege a breakdown of trust and confidence between shareholders holding equal number of shares. 1 Petition to wind-up the Respondent. The debt claimed in the Statutory Notice is not based on any judgment of court. The Petitioner has filed a suit in the Session Court based on the same documents relied on by the Petitioner in this Petition. Petitioner’s application for summary judgement in the Sessions Court suit was dismissed. Whether the dismissal of the Petitioners summary judgement application can be considered a bona fide dispute on substantial grounds. 1 Petition to wind up the Respondent pursuant to section 465 (1) ( e) of the Companies Act 2016 1 Petition to wind-up the Respondent under section 465 and 466 of the Companies Act 2016. Whether irregular service of the Statutory Notice invalidates the Petition despite the Respondent not having suffered any substantial injustice from such irregular service. Whether of section 582(1) and (2) of the Companies Act 2026 can cure such irregularity. 1 Petition to wind up the Respondent pursuant to section 465(1)(e) read with section 466(1)(a) of the Companies Act 2016 (“CA 2016”). 1

Cases Delivered (11)