Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz
About J Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz
Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz has 43 reported Malaysia decisions (2023–2025). These were decided across MYHC (43). By subject matter, the largest shares are Company Law (26), Bankruptcy & Insolvency (13) and Civil Procedure (9). Of these, 43 as the delivering judge.
On the judicial record
Illustrates how the High Court applies the Companies Act 2016 winding-up and judicial-management regime across disputed-debt, statutory-notice and just-and-equitable petitions.
Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz sits in the High Court of Malaya, and the reported decisions collected here place him firmly in the commercial and corporate-insolvency work of the Mahkamah Tinggi (High Court). The dominant strand of the docket is the winding up of companies under the Companies Act 2016, on petitions brought under seksyen 465 dan 466 Akta Syarikat 2016 (sections 465 and 466 of the Companies Act 2016). These include petitions grounded on an unsatisfied statutory demand under section 465(1)(e), on the just and equitable ground under section 465(1)(f) and (h), and on a company's loss of substratum after it ceased business. Recurring questions in the winding-up matters include whether irregular service of a statutory notice invalidates a petition where the respondent has suffered no substantial injustice, whether a judgment debtor may re-open the merits of the underlying judgment at the winding-up stage, and the standing of a petitioning creditor to present the petition. Alongside that work the court hears applications to place companies under judicial management (pengurusan kehakiman) under the same Act, and applications to set aside winding-up orders said to have been obtained in contravention of the Winding-Up Rules. The docket is not confined to insolvency: it also takes in banking and finance disputes, an intellectual-property claim turning on whether an industrial design possessed the requisite eye-appeal in its finished product, and a negligence claim for loss caused by a fire on a yacht. Across these matters the judgments work carefully through the statutory preconditions to relief and the discretion the court retains even where a petitioner establishes a debt. The value of the collection lies in seeing how a single High Court judge applies the Companies Act 2016 winding-up regime across a spread of commercial fact patterns, from disputed debts and contested statutory notices to a shareholder breakdown of trust and confidence.
How many cases has Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz decided?
Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz has 43 reported Malaysia decisions (2023–2025), 43 of them as the delivering judge.
Which courts does Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz sit in?
Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz sits in MYHC (43).
What kinds of cases does Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz most often decide?
The reported decisions concentrate on corporate insolvency in the High Court — company winding-up petitions under sections 465 and 466 of the Companies Act 2016 and applications for judicial management — alongside banking and finance disputes, an industrial-design infringement claim, and a negligence action arising from a fire on a vessel.
Which statute features most prominently in these winding-up decisions?
The Companies Act 2016 (Akta Syarikat 2016). The petitions turn on its winding-up provisions, particularly section 465(1)(e) for an unsatisfied statutory demand and section 465(1)(f) and (h) for the just and equitable ground and loss of substratum, with the court examining service of the statutory notice and the standing of the petitioner.