JET AVIATION (MALAYSIA) MRO SDN. BHD. v TRI-AERO SDN. BHD.

wa-28ncc-915-11-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 9 January 2024 • WA-28NCC-915-11/2022 • 4 min read

Outcome

For the above reasons, I allow the Petition to wind-up the Respondent. I also allow the other consequential prayers including costs.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (wa-28ncc-915-11-2022). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Enclosure 1 is a Petition to wind up the Respondent pursuant to section 465(1)(e) read with section 466(1)(a) of the Companies Act 2016 (“CA 2016”).

Practice Areas

Company Law

Judges (1)

Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz Delivered

Counsel (2)

Zaid Ibrahim & Co Firm Sara Mohamed Hear Counsel Petitioner

Parties (2)

JET AVIATION MRO Sdn Bhd Petitioner TRI-AERO Sdn Bhd Respondent

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)
s 466(1)(a)

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-28ncc-915-11-2022)