1. ) EMRAIL SDN BHD 2. ) ZAKI BIN AZMI 3. ) HARI NARAYANAN A/L GOVINDASAMY 4. ) AMRISH A/L HARI NARAYANAN v KUWAIT FINANCE HOUSE (MALAYSIA) BERHAD

wa-22m-1073-12-2019 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 8 September 2024 • WA-22M-1073-12/2019 • 8 min read

2 cases cited (0 SG, 2 foreign)

Outcome

For the reasons aforesaid, I allow the Defendant’s application in Enclosure 213 with costs.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (wa-22m-1073-12-2019). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Application to amend Statement of Defence by adding a counter-claim against the Plaintiff. Whether the counter-claim is designed to nullify the Injunction Order dated 19.12.2021 obtained by the Plaintiff against the Defendant.

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz Delivered

Counsel (6)

Azmi & Associates Firm Kumar Partnership Firm Craig Ho Counsel Plaintiff Shaarvin Raaj Counsel Plaintiff Wafiy Azman Counsel Defendant Wardah Yunus Counsel Defendant

Parties (5)

EMRAIL Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Kuwait Finance House Berhad Defendant Amrish a/l Hari Narayanan Plaintiff Hari Narayanan a/l Govindasamy Plaintiff Zaki bin Azmi Plaintiff

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (2)

MY (2)

[1985] 1 MLJ 157 [2009] 4 MLJ 833

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22m-1073-12-2019)