D

Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur

Person 9 cases

About Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur

Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur appears as a party in 9 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning April 2023 to December 2025. Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur appeared as respondent in 4 cases, appellant in 2 cases, defendant in 2 cases. Cases span the High Court (7), Court of Appeal (1), Federal Court (1).

How many court cases involve Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur?

Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur appears in 9 published judgments from April 2023 to December 2025. Most commonly as respondent (4 cases).

In which Malaysian courts has Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur appeared?

Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur has appeared across High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (7 cases) and Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) (1 cases) and Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) (1 cases), totaling 9 judgments.

Practice Areas

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Judicial review 2 judicial review the Datuk Bandar’s discretion in the grant of planning permission conversion of public space for commercial development Federal Territory (Planning) Act of 1952 1 Trespass- structure which formed part of a drain built was on the Land and encroached onto the Land owned by the respondent- defence of justification and pleaded statutory immunity for the existence of the Drain- existence of the Drain is crucial to avoid any flash flood and/or erosion within the vicinity of the Land and is in the public interest- monsoon drain was already built prior to the Respondents purchase of the said land- statutory duty to maintain storm water drains, culverts, gutters and watercourses within the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur- defence of justification in answer to an allegation of trespass 1 Whether the SCJ erred in law and in fact in her findings that in the Plaintiffs’ pleadings, there is no agreement against the D1 in the 26.6.2018 Meeting 1 Permohonan pindaan Writ dan Penyata Tuntutan di bawah Aturan 20 Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 1 1 Ini merupakan permohonan Defendan menurut Aturan 18 Kaedah 19(a), (b) dan (d) Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 (KKM 2012) untuk membatalkan Writ Terpinda bertarikh 15.10.2024 dan Pernyataan Tuntutan Terpinda bertarikh 15.10.2024 oleh Plaintif-plaintif terhadap Defendan (Lampiran 10). 1 2 Mahkamah ini akhirnya bersetuju dengan hujahan Defendan bahawa Plaintif Pertama dan Plaintif Kedua tidak mempunyai satu kausa tindakan yang munasabah terhadap Defendan berdasarkan Kaedah 25(7), 32, 34(1) dan (2) Kaedah tersebut, di mana adalah jelas Lembaga Tatatertib Bebas mempunyai kuasa untuk mengenakan hukuman buang kerja sekiranya mendapati seorang pegawai penguatkuasa disabitkan dengan kesalahan jenayah. 1 3 Kesalahan yang disabitkan atas Plaintif-plaintif jelas menunjukkan bahawa Plaintif-plaintif telah terlibat dalam pergaduhan di tempat awam semasa bertugas dan ianya adalah satu kesalahan yang serius. 1

Defendant (2)

Respondent (4)

Appellant (2)

Applicant (1)