1. ) RANJAN PARAMALINGAM 2. ) JUDE MICORY LOBIJIN v 1. ) DATUK BANDAR KUALA LUMPUR 2. ) PERSATUAN PENDUDUK TAMAN BANGSAR

wa-25-289-09-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 3 November 2025 • WA-25-289-09/2023

Catchwords

Approvals given by DBKL to Bangsar Park Residents Association (“BPRA”) for GN scheme-approvals lapsed-Applicants challenged DBKL’s inaction to permit continuation of scheme-after JR filed, DBKL granted approval-whether JR academic or premature- moulding of reliefs by the court whether JR filed out of time as grounds for application arose much earlier when earlier approval lapsed -jurisdiction of court to hear JR when O.53 r.3(6) not complied with -whether GN scheme is illegal or unconstitutional-Court of Appeal had in earlier suit filed by Applicants against BPRA for nuisance and breach of privacy laws, held it to be legal-s.101 of the Local Government Act 1976 allows DBKL to approve the scheme-whether same issues in private law action being litigated in present JR-whether mandamus ought to issue against DBKL to remove structures.

Practice Areas

Approvals given by DBKL to Bangsar Park Residents Association (“BPRA”) for GN scheme-approvals lapsed-Applicants challenged DBKL’s inaction to permit continuation of scheme-after JR filed, DBKL granted approval-whether JR academic or premature- moulding of reliefs by the court whether JR filed out of time as grounds for application arose much earlier when earlier approval lapsed -jurisdiction of court to hear JR when O.53 r.3(6) not complied with -whether GN scheme is illegal or unconstitutional-Court of Appeal had in earlier suit filed by Applicants against BPRA for nuisance and breach of privacy laws, held it to be legal-s.101 of the Local Government Act 1976 allows DBKL to approve the scheme-whether same issues in private law action being litigated in present JR-whether mandamus ought to issue against DBKL to remove structures.

Judges (1)

Alice Loke Yee Ching Delivered

Parties (4)

PERSATUAN PENDUDUK TAMAN BANGSAR Respondent Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur Respondent Jude Micory Lobijin Applicant Ranjan Paramalingam Applicant

Case Significance

1. ) RANJAN PARAMALINGAM 2. ) JUDE MICORY LOBIJIN v 1. ) DATUK BANDAR KUALA L... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated November 3, 2025 (citation: wa-25-289-09-2023). The case was decided by Alice Loke Yee Ching.

What was the outcome of 1. ) RANJAN PARAMALINGAM 2. ) JUDE MICORY LOBIJIN v 1. ) DATUK BANDAR KUALA L...?

1. ) RANJAN PARAMALINGAM 2. ) JUDE MICORY LOBIJIN v 1. ) DATUK BANDAR KUALA L... is a High Court decision dated November 3, 2025. The case was heard by Alice Loke Yee Ching. See the full judgment for details.