M

MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD

Organisation 25 cases

About MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD

MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD appears as a party in 25 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning January 2025 to January 2026. MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD appeared as plaintiff in 10 cases, applicant in 6 cases, judgment creditor in 3 cases. Cases span the High Court (25).

Case areas include Civil Procedure (3 cases), Civil procedure (3 cases), Kanun Tanah Negara 1965 (2 cases).

How many court cases involve MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD?

MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD appears in 25 published judgments from January 2025 to January 2026. Most commonly as plaintiff (10 cases).

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure 6 Kanun Tanah Negara 1965 2 Tatacara Sivil 1 Banking—Guarantee and indemnity—Enforcement—Summary judgment—Order 14 Rules of Court 2012—Guarantor’s liability—Joint and several liability for banking facilities—Whether bona fide triable issues raised—Defence alleging duty on bank to monitor borrower’s financial position and to act in guarantor’s interest—Whether such duty existed—Express terms of facility and guarantee negating any supervisory duty—Effect of variations, indulgences and restructuring granted to principal borrower—Purview doctrine—Whether applicable—Alleged delay in realisation of securities—Section 94 Contracts Act 1950—Whether impairment or loss of security established—Mere allegation of delay insufficient—Certificate of Indebtedness—Whether challenge raised with particulars or evidence of manifest error—Bare assertion inadequate—Civil procedure—Striking out—Counterclaim repeating unsustainable defences—Whether discloses reasonable cause of action—Abuse of process—Further and better particulars—Function of particulars confined to material facts—No prejudice shown—Statement of claim sufficient—Summary judgment allowed—Counterclaim struck out—Application for particulars dismissed—Costs of RM20,000 awarded for all three applications. 1 Summary judgment 1 The Plaintiff, who is the administratrix of her late father’s estate, has a valid grievance in commencing the present action. The Plaintiff’s late father, through a Sale and Purchase Agreement dated 2 March, 2000 bought a house from the 1st Defendant for the sum of RM92,000.00. 1 To partially finance the purchase, the Plaintiff’s late father obtained a loan from the 2nd Defendant in the sum of RM25,000.00, with an additional RM463.00 imposed for takaful charges. The agreed repayment period was 15 years, with monthly instalments of RM245.00. By a letter dated 4 May 2018, the 2nd Defendant informed the Plaintiff’s late father that the loan had been fully settled and invited him to meet with the bank to discuss the release of the original title to the house. 1 To date, the title remained in the name of the vendor, namely the 1st Defendant, prompting the Plaintiff to commence the present action in seeking for the title of the house to be registered in the Plaintiff’s name. The Plaintiff has named two Defendants, Radzali bin Ahmad Koldi (the vendor) and Maybank Islamic Berhad (the lender) as the 1st and 2nd Defendants respectively. 1

Plaintiff (10)

Intervener (1)

Applicant (6)

Judgment Creditor (3)

Respondent (3)

Defendant (1)

Aggrieved Party (1)