PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN DIAMOND F v 1. ) PESURUHJAYA BANGUNAN KUALA LUMPUR 2. ) MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD PENCELAH PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN DIAMOND F

wa-24ncvc-1263-04-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 6 April 2025 • WA-24NCvC-1263-04/2023

Catchwords

Scope of power of a Commissioner of Buildings – Strata Management Act 2013 – Verification of names of newly elected management committee members – Whether Commissioner of Buildings has power to require statutory declarations to be filed for verification purposes – Paragraph 7(8) of Second Schedule, Strata Management Act 2013 – Only certified true copies of the resolutions passed at the general meeting and certified true copies of the minutes of general meeting are required for verification purposes – Whether Commissioner of Buildings has power to issue letter of recognition of committee members – Signatories of management corporation’s bank account – Whether bank may rely on letter of recognition from Commissioner of Buildings to decline signatories of management corporation and freeze bank account – Paragraph 7(5) of the Second Schedule – Minutes of meeting signed by the chairman of the meeting or the secretary are admissible as prima facie evidence without further proof – Circular issued by Commissioner of Buildings to impose additional requirements are ultra vires and void

Practice Areas

Scope of power of a Commissioner of Buildings

Judges (1)

Gan Techiong Delivered

Parties (4)

MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD Respondent PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN DIAMOND F Applicant PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN DIAMOND F Intervener Pesuruhjaya Bangunan Kuala Lumpur Respondent

Case Significance

PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN DIAMOND F v 1. ) PESURUHJAYA BANGUNAN KUALA LUMPUR 2. )... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated April 6, 2025 (citation: wa-24ncvc-1263-04-2023). The case was decided by Gan Techiong.

What was the outcome of PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN DIAMOND F v 1. ) PESURUHJAYA BANGUNAN KUALA LUMPUR 2. )...?

PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN DIAMOND F v 1. ) PESURUHJAYA BANGUNAN KUALA LUMPUR 2. )... is a High Court decision dated April 6, 2025. The case was heard by Gan Techiong. See the full judgment for details.