B
BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD
Organisation 12 cases
About BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD
BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD appears as a party in 12 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning October 2018 to February 2026. BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD appeared as plaintiff in 4 cases, defendant in 3 cases, respondent in 2 cases. Cases span the High Court (11), Federal Court (1).
Case areas include Civil Procedure (4 cases), Banking (2 cases), whether a breach of a facility agreement by a bank exonerates the borrower and guarantors from repayment of the outstanding debt (1 cases).
How many court cases involve BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD?
BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD appears in 12 published judgments from October 2018 to February 2026. Most commonly as plaintiff (4 cases).
In which Malaysian courts has BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD appeared?
BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD has appeared across High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (11 cases) and Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) (1 cases), totaling 12 judgments.
Practice Areas
Civil Procedure 5 Banking 2 whether a breach of a facility agreement by a bank exonerates the borrower and guarantors from repayment of the outstanding debt 1 whether a bank breached a facility agreement by not making payment when it was served with notice of a pending Mareva injunction proceeding 1 the application of the relation back theory 1 Kausa tindakan 1 Summons for directions-the entitlement of the secured creditors to claim interest after the making of the winding-up order- whether the sum received from the Government of Malaysia forms part of the secured assets of the Financiers or is available to the general estate- whether, by operation of section 524(3)(b) CA 2016 read with section 8(2A) of the Insolvency Act 1967 (“IA 1967”) and section 4 of the Civil Law Act 1956 (“CLA 1956”), the Financiers are entitled to interest accruing after 29 August 2018- whether the Judgment Sum is subject to the security interests of the Financiers or forms part of the unencumbered assets of the Company-Section 524(3)(b) CA 2016, read together with section 8(2A) IA 1967, provides that a secured creditor who does not realise its security within the stipulated period is not entitled to interest accruing after the winding-up order- the provision does not confer a discretion on the Court-it imposes a statutory consequence- winding-up order therefore remained effective in law from 29 August 2018, notwithstanding the stay orders- It is unnecessary to determine whether there was any temporal gap between the various stay orders-even if the stays were continuous, they do not affect the operative date of the winding-up order for the purposes of section 524(3)(b)- The Financiers did not realise their security within the statutory period. Accordingly, by operation of section 524(3)(b) CA 2016 read with section 8(2A) IA 1967 and section 4 CLA 1956, interest ceased to accrue thereafter- the Judgment Sum became part of the credit balance of an assigned Project Account and therefore forms part of the secured assets of the Financiers- The Syndicated Financiers and Bank Pembangunan Malaysia Berhad, whether in its capacity as a Syndicated Financier or as Government Support Loan Financier, are not entitled to interest accruing after 29 August 2018.-the Liquidator is directed to take an account of any post-winding-up interest charged or retained after that date and to make the necessary adjustments in accordance with law-the judgment sum forms part of the secured assets subject to the security interests of the Syndicated Financiers. 1 This case concerns an application to stay execution of an Order for Sale granted under the National Land Code 1965. The validity of the Order was not challenged. The sole issue was whether the defendant had established special or exceptional circumstances to justify a stay. 1
Applicant (1)
Aggrieved Party (1)
Defendant (3)
wa-22m-1817-12-2024 MYHC
KOPERASI SERBAGUNA IMAN MALAYSIA BERHAD v BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD PIHAK KETIGA 1. ) Datuk Mohd Irwan Bin Mohd Mubarak 2. ) Dato' Sri Khairul Dzaimee Daud 3. ) Dato' Dr Amiruddin Muhamed 4. ) Tunku Dato' Ahmad Burhanuddin Bin Tunku Datu Seri Adnan 5. ) Mohd Jafri Bin Kudus 6. ) Dato' Seri Dr. Vaseehar Hassan Abdul Razack 7. ) Profesor Dr. Raduan Bin Idar 8. ) Idris Bin Abd Hamid 9. ) Mohd Khairil Bin Abidin BUKAN PIHAK-PIHAK 1. ) DATUK MOHD IRWAN BIN MOHD MUBARAK 2. ) DATO' SRI K...
28 October 2025
ba-22ncc-59-05-2021 MYHC
SAFIAH SULAIMAN BINTI ISMAIL v BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD
24 September 2025
wa-22m-72-04-2021 MYHC
NIK ANIRA BINTI NIK MOHD ZAIN (sebagai pentadbir kepada pusaka NIK MOHD ZAIN BIN HAJI OMAR) v BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD
16 April 2025
Respondent (2)
Plaintiff (4)
wa-22m-841-11-2022 MYHC
BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD v 1. ) NURO DAGANGAN SDN. BHD. 2. ) MUHAMAD AZMI BIN OTHMAN 3. ) MOKHTAR BIN OTHMAN 4. ) MUHAMAD IZZAT EMIR BIN MUHAMAD AZMI 5. ) MUHAMAD IZZHAM EMIR BIN MUHAMAD AZMI
13 October 2025
wa-22m-503-05-2024 MYHC
BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD v 1. ) Temasek Blooms Sdn Bhd 2. ) Dato' Colin Tan June Teng @ Chen Junting 3. ) Dato' Edwin Tan Ping Huang @ Chen Binghuang
9 February 2025
12bm-1-01-2019 MYHC
Bank Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia Berhad v 1. M. Kamala a/p Perumal @ Muthusamy 2. Raventeran a/l Vadivelu
5 August 2019
12am-7-07-2018 MYHC
Bank Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia Berhad
8 October 2018