KOPERASI SERBAGUNA IMAN MALAYSIA BERHAD v BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD PIHAK KETIGA 1. ) Datuk Mohd Irwan Bin Mohd Mubarak 2. ) Dato' Sri Khairul Dzaimee Daud 3. ) Dato' Dr Amiruddin Muhamed 4. ) Tunku Dato' Ahmad Burhanuddin Bin Tunku Datu Seri Adnan 5. ) Mohd Jafri Bin Kudus 6. ) Dato' Seri Dr. Vaseehar Hassan Abdul Razack 7. ) Profesor Dr. Raduan Bin Idar 8. ) Idris Bin Abd Hamid 9. ) Mohd Khairil Bin Abidin BUKAN PIHAK-PIHAK 1. ) DATUK MOHD IRWAN BIN MOHD MUBARAK 2. ) DATO' SRI K...
Catchwords
Civil Procedure – Striking out – Fraudulent concealment – Suppression of material facts – Whether plea of fraud sustainable to set aside final judgment – Whether claim frivolous, vexatious, or abuse of process – Whether action barred by res judicata – Whether “fresh evidence” required – Whether action amounted to impermissible collateral attack on prior judgment – Res Judicata – Issue Estoppel – Finality of litigation – Exception for fraud – Whether fraud properly pleaded – Whether quantum dispute could and should have been raised earlier – Rules of Court 2012, O.18 r.19(1)(b) and (d) – Evidence Act 1950, s.44 – Cooperative Societies Act 1993, s.58. Judgment – Impeachment of judgment – Fraud – Suppression of payments – Final judgment affirmed by Federal Court – Whether subsequent action to set aside permissible – Whether “reasonable diligence” required – Fresh evidence – Whether plaintiff’s own payment records constituted “new facts” – Distinction between external fraud and internal accounting discrepancy. Abuse of Process – Multiplicity of proceedings – Attempt to circumvent prior discovery ruling – Prior discovery application dismissed – Subsequent suit filed five days later seeking same financial accounting – Whether action tactical and oppressive – Whether constituting “second bite at the cherry” – Abuse of court process – Striking out warranted. Evidence – Fraud – Materiality – Conscious and deliberate dishonesty – Pleading requirements – Whether suppression of plaintiff’s own payments amounted to fraud – Whether defendant’s partial disclosure in earlier suit negated fraud plea. Banking – Islamic finance – Bai Al-Inah facilities – Certificate of Indebtedness – Summary judgment under Order 14A – Subsequent challenge on grounds of fraudulent misstatement of indebtedness – Whether sustainable.
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Parties (20)
BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD Defendant KOPERASI SERBAGUNA IMAN MALAYSIA BERHAD Plaintiff Dato' Dr Amiruddin Muhamed Non Party Dato' Dr Amiruddin Muhamed Third Party Dato' Seri Dr. Vaseehar Hassan Abdul Razack Non Party Dato' Seri Dr. Vaseehar Hassan Abdul Razack Third Party Dato' Sri Khairul Dzaimee Daud Non Party Dato' Sri Khairul Dzaimee Daud Third Party Datuk Mohd Irwan bin Mohd Mubarak Non Party Datuk Mohd Irwan bin Mohd Mubarak Third Party Idris bin Abd Hamid Non Party Idris bin Abd Hamid Third Party Mohamad Khairil bin Abidin Non Party Mohd Jafri bin Kudus Non Party Mohd Jafri bin Kudus Third Party Mohd Khairil bin Abidin Third Party Profesor Dr. Raduan bin Idar Third Party Profesor Dr. Raduwan bin Idar Non Party Tunku Dato Ahmad Burhanuddin bin Tunku Datuk Seri Adnan Non Party Tunku Dato' Ahmad Burhanuddin bin Tunku Datu Seri Adnan Third Party
Case Significance
KOPERASI SERBAGUNA IMAN MALAYSIA BERHAD v BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERH... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 28, 2025 (citation: wa-22m-1817-12-2024). The case was decided by Yusrin Faidz bin Yusoff.
What was the outcome of KOPERASI SERBAGUNA IMAN MALAYSIA BERHAD v BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERH...?
KOPERASI SERBAGUNA IMAN MALAYSIA BERHAD v BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERH... is a High Court decision dated October 28, 2025. The case was heard by Yusrin Faidz bin Yusoff. See the full judgment for details.