NOOR FAREKH BINTI MOHAMED KASSIM v BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD
Catchwords
Civil Procedure – Appeal – Competency of appeal – Whether appeal barred under s 28(1)(a) Courts of Judicature Act 1964 – Whether appeal raised questions of law notwithstanding quantum below RM10,000 – Natural justice – Adjournment – Failure to secure subpoenaed witness – Whether refusal to adjourn constituted denial of fair trial – Courts of Judicature Act 1964, s.28(1), & s.68(1)(a) – Rules of Court 2012, o.18 r.7, o.38 r.14, & o.55 rr.2, 3, & 4. Banking – Credit card facility – Unauthorised transactions – Whether bank in breach of contract or duty of care – Whether bank liable under Quincecare duty – Whether bank complied with Bank Negara Malaysia guidelines – Banker and customer relationship – Nature of duty – Whether fiduciary duty owed – Whether relationship governed by terms of agreement – Co-operative Societies Act 1993, s.7, s.8 & s.9 – Bank Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia Berhad (Special Provisions) Act 1978, s.3 – Development Financial Institutions Act 2002, s.3 and the First Schedule.
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Case Significance
NOOR FAREKH BINTI MOHAMED KASSIM v BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 12, 2025 (citation: wa-11bm-1-09-2024). The case was decided by Yusrin Faidz bin Yusoff.
What was the outcome of NOOR FAREKH BINTI MOHAMED KASSIM v BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD?
NOOR FAREKH BINTI MOHAMED KASSIM v BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD is a High Court decision dated June 12, 2025. The case was heard by Yusrin Faidz bin Yusoff. See the full judgment for details.