A

Anita binti Harun

J 16 cases

About J Anita binti Harun

Anita binti Harun has been involved in 16 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning February 2025 to November 2025. These cases are from the High Court (16 cases). Anita binti Harun served as the delivering judge in 16 of these cases.

Key areas of jurisprudence include CIVIL PROCEDURE (5 cases). Anita binti Harun holds the designation of Dato'.

16

Total Cases

16

Delivered

0

Sat On (Coram)

How many cases has Anita binti Harun been involved in?

Anita binti Harun has been involved in 16 published judgments from February 2025 to November 2025, serving as the delivering judge in 16 of them. Cases span the High Court (16 cases).

What types of cases does Anita binti Harun typically handle?

Based on 16 published judgments, Anita binti Harun's most common case types include CIVIL PROCEDURE (5 cases).

Practice Areas

CIVIL PROCEDURE 5 BA-12B-41-05/2023, BA-12B-42-05/2023 and BA-12B-43-06/2023 are consolidated appeals arising from the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge delivered on 19 May 2023. The Plaintiff’s claim for damages arising out of a motor-vehicle accident was dismissed, while the counterclaim of the Third Defendant, the insurer of the vehicle, was allowed with costs. BA-12B-41-05/2023 2 CIVIL PROCEDURE: Appeal- Application to amend notice of appeal-Whether prejudice caused-Whether delay of filing application is fatal-Whether application made mala fide and abuse of the court’s process-No specific provision to amend Notice of Appeal-O.55 r.9; Rules of Court 2012 1 These are consolidated appeals by the Defendant 1 and Defendant 3 (the Appellants herein) against the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge who after full trial, found both liable for defamation and awarded damages and injunctive relief in favour of the Plaintiffs (the Respondents herein). 1 This is an appeal by Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad, the Appellant (the Plaintiff below) against the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge (“SCJ”) dismissing its claim against the Respondent (the Defendant below) under an Education Sponsorship Agreement dated 19.12.2011 (“the Agreement”). For consistency, the parties shall be referred to as they were in the Sessions Court. 1 This is the Plaintiff’s Notice of Application (Enclosure 10) for summary judgment under Order 14 rules 1 and 3 of the Rules of Court 2012 against both the Defendants jointly and severally. Order 14 empowers the Court to enter summary judgment where the defendant has no defence to the claim or has no defence except as to quantum, unless the defendant satisfies the Court that there is an issue or question in dispute which ought to be tried or some other reason for trial. The Plaintiff submits that the Defendants are indebted for the outstanding settlement sum and late payment interest; that the Side Letter and Letter of Undertaking bind the Defendants; that the Defendants have admitted liability by conduct and correspondence; and that no bona fide triable issue arises. The Defendants resist the application on the grounds that this is within Zurich exclusive jurisdiction due to the Swiss law clause; that the settlement sum is misconstrued; that correspondence is “without prejudice” and inadmissible; that the 2nd Defendant’s liability is limited to “balance payment” and/or is discharged under section 86 of the Contracts Act 1950; and that the late-payment interest computation is said to be questionable. The Court found that the Plaintiff has established a clear and liquidated claim supported by documentary evidence and that the Defendants failed to raise any triable issues. 1 Enclosure 4 is the Plaintiff’s application by a Notice of Application dated 3.6.2025 under section 19(1)(c) of the Debtors Act 1957 for an order of attachment before judgment against the Defendant, WeGrow Global Sdn Bhd. The Plaintiff contends that the Defendant is in substantial arrears of rent and service charges exceeding RM2.29 million, has repudiated the binding effect of a tenancy agreement called the Heads of Terms dated 23.11.2023, and has taken steps to remove its property from the demised premises with intent to defeat execution of any judgment. The Defendant resists the application, contending that the Heads of Terms is not binding, that there is no good cause of action, and that there is neither intent to obstruct nor any act of removal or concealment of property. 1 This is an appeal by the Plaintiff against the Court’s decision who declined to grant the Plaintiff leave to commence committal proceedings against the Defendant under Order 52 of the Rules of Court 2012. Committal requires strict procedural compliance. Here, the operative Court of Appeal order alleged to have been breached was not served, having instead served a copy of the amended High Court order; service was irregular; the penal notice was attached only to an obsolete High Court order; and the alleged acts do not correspond to any surviving operative terms of the order. These are not minor defects but strike at the foundation of committal jurisdiction. The Plaintiff has therefore failed to cross the mandatory threshold for leave. 1

Cases Delivered (16)

ba-22ncvc-181-05-2025 MYHC

SR TECHNICS SWITZERLAND LTD v 1. ) WORLD CARGO AIRLINE SDN. BHD. 2. ) ASIA CARGO NETWORK SDN. BHD.

27 November 2025

ba-12b-42-05-2023 MYHC

1. ) Shathiswaran A/l Nadaraja 2. ) MUNEESWARI A/P RAMAN v 1. ) Vickneswaran A/l Nadan 2. ) AXA AFFIN GENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD

26 November 2025

ba-12b-43-06-2023 MYHC

AXA AFFIN GENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD v 1. ) VIKNESWARAN A/L NADAN 2. ) Shathiswaran A/l Nadaraja 3. ) MUNEESWARI A/P RAMAN

26 November 2025

ba-24ncvc-981-05-2025 MYHC

Kuantan Waterfront Resort City Sdn Bhd v PEMUNGUT DUTI SETEM

3 November 2025

ba-22ncvc-207-05-2025 MYHC

SILVERLAND CAPITAL SDN BHD v WEGROW GLOBAL SDN BHD

ba-24nccarb-7-09-2025 MYHC

PUNCAK GALI HARMONI SDN BHD v EMRAIL SDN BHD

ba-22ncvc-431-07-2016 MYHC

29 September 2025

ba-12bcy-1-01-2025 MYHC

1. ) HO THAM MOI 2. ) LEE HONG KEOW v TAY YU YAA

28 September 2025

ba-12bncc-7-05-2025 MYHC

MALAYSIA AIRPORTS HOLDINGS BERHAD v RABIN SUGUNA BALAN

25 September 2025

ba-24ncvc-979-05-2025 MYHC

1. ) ELIZABETH A/P PARIYANAN 2. ) JOHNSON RAMASAMY A/L MARAN 3. ) NANTHINE A/P THIRUVENGIDAM 4. ) GUNASEKARAN A/L MARAN v 1. ) MORGUN A/L V.NADESAN 2. ) USHAH DEVI A/P RAJAMANIKAM 3. ) MANISHADEVIE A/P MANIKUMAR 4. ) SANUSHA A/P MURUGAYA 5. ) MAYA VESVANATHAN 6. ) UTHAYARAAJ A/L BALAKRISHNAN

23 September 2025

ba-12b-9-01-2024 MYHC

THIEN HONG MACHINERY (M) SDN BHD v 1. ) MS TIME SDN BHD 2. ) DATUK SERI MOHD EFFANDIE BIN AHMAD

17 September 2025

ba-24ncvc-1173-05-2025 MYHC

ZULKORNAIN AHMAD v MARINA BINTI MOHAMED

16 September 2025

ba-22ncvc-389-09-2024 MYHC

1. ) LIM TECK HOE 2. ) EE KAI XIN v 1. ) Abdul Nasir bin Abdul Ghaffar 2. ) Chantru a/l Murugan 3. ) Nur Aina Adilla Binti Abdul Nasir 4. ) Nur Auefa Aiena Binti Abd Nasir 5. ) Ng Seven Resources 6. ) Go Search Katharsis 77 Sdn Bhd

ba-12ancvc-1-01-2025 MYHC

SYED DZULFAKAR ALI BIN SYED MUSTAFA v ROZITA BINTI IBRAHIM

ba-24ncvc-1953-09-2024 MYHC

BIMAL PILLAI v 1. ) BRB MALAYSIA SDN. BHD. 2. ) BRB INTERNATIONAL B. V. 3. ) PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD 4. ) NIK AMRI BIN NIK MOHAMED 5. ) PAUL ANTHONY TAYLOR 6. ) AMRI BIN RAZALI

ba-12b-41-05-2023 MYHC

VIKNESWARAN A/L NADAN v 1. ) Shathiswaran A/l Nadaraja 2. ) MUNEESWARI A/P RAMAN 3. ) AXA AFFIN GENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD

12 February 2025