Anita binti Harun
About J Anita binti Harun
Anita binti Harun has 42 reported Malaysia decisions (2024–2026). These were decided across MYHC (42). By subject matter, the largest shares are Civil Procedure (26), Contract (6) and Company Law (5). Of these, 42 as the delivering judge.
On the judicial record
A window on the civil and commercial workload of a High Court, showing how procedural gateways under the Rules of Court 2012 and statutory tests under the Companies Act 2016 and Strata Titles Act 1985 shape the disposal of a claim.
Anita binti Harun sits in the High Court, and the reported decisions collected here are almost entirely civil and commercial, with judgments authored in English. The docket is broad. A recurring theme is strata and property management — disputes over whether a particular parcel was intended to be common property under the Strata Titles Act 1985 and the Town and Country Planning Act 1976, and appeals from the Sessions Court over unpaid maintenance charges and sinking-fund contributions. Company law features through minority-oppression actions under seksyen 346 Akta Syarikat 2016 (section 346 of the Companies Act 2016), in which shareholders allege that the affairs of a company have been conducted in a manner unfairly prejudicial to their interests. Civil procedure runs through much of the collection: applications for pre-action discovery under Order 24 rule 7A of the Rules of Court 2012, applications to strike out a writ and statement of claim under Order 18 rule 19, summary-disposal applications under Order 14A, and appeals from the subordinate courts. The docket also takes in contract disputes — including a claim to characterise a large sum as a purchase deposit rather than a loan — interlocutory injunction applications heard inter partes after an initial ex parte grant, and the assessment of damages remitted from the Court of Appeal for the High Court to quantify. Banking and land matters appear alongside these. The judgments are careful to identify the precise procedural gateway invoked and to test whether its threshold is met before turning to the merits, a pattern visible whether the question is the strike-out standard, the discovery test, or the requirements of an Order 14A determination. Individuals who feature only as private parties are referred to here by role, while corporate and institutional parties are named. The collection is a useful window on the civil and commercial workload of a busy High Court, and on how procedural gateways shape the disposal of a claim.
How many cases has Anita binti Harun decided?
Anita binti Harun has 42 reported Malaysia decisions (2024–2026), 42 of them as the delivering judge.
Which courts does Anita binti Harun sit in?
Anita binti Harun sits in MYHC (42).
What areas of law dominate Anita binti Harun's reported decisions?
Civil and commercial work in the High Court: strata and property-management disputes under the Strata Titles Act 1985, minority-oppression actions under section 346 of the Companies Act 2016, contract claims, and a substantial body of civil-procedure applications including discovery, striking out and summary disposal.
How do the civil-procedure applications tend to be approached?
The judgments identify the specific procedural gateway invoked — for example Order 24 rule 7A for pre-action discovery, Order 18 rule 19 for striking out, or Order 14A for summary determination — and test whether its threshold is satisfied before considering the merits of the underlying claim.