BIMAL PILLAI v 1. ) BRB MALAYSIA SDN. BHD. 2. ) BRB INTERNATIONAL B. V. 3. ) PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD 4. ) NIK AMRI BIN NIK MOHAMED 5. ) PAUL ANTHONY TAYLOR 6. ) AMRI BIN RAZALI
Catchwords
CIVIL PROCEDURE — Affidavit — Defective affidavit without jurat — Whether affidavit must be disregarded in the absence of jurat — Whether defects can be termed as irregular — Rules of Court 2012 O 41 r 3 CIVIL PROCEDURE — Costs — Security for costs — Foreign plaintiff — Exercise of discretion of court — Whether plaintiff is not ordinarily resident in Malaysia — Plaintiff's lack of assets within Malaysia — Likelihood of plaintiff satisfying costs — Likelihood of plaintiff succeeding the case — Rules of Court 2012 O 23 r 1(1)
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Case Significance
BIMAL PILLAI v 1. ) BRB MALAYSIA SDN. BHD. 2. ) BRB INTERNATIONAL B. V. 3. ) ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated May 14, 2025 (citation: ba-24ncvc-1953-09-2024). The case was decided by Anita binti Harun.
What was the outcome of BIMAL PILLAI v 1. ) BRB MALAYSIA SDN. BHD. 2. ) BRB INTERNATIONAL B. V. 3. ) ...?
BIMAL PILLAI v 1. ) BRB MALAYSIA SDN. BHD. 2. ) BRB INTERNATIONAL B. V. 3. ) ... is a High Court decision dated May 14, 2025. The case was heard by Anita binti Harun. See the full judgment for details.