T
Tee Ai Ling
Person 1 case
Tee Ai Ling appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:
wa-22ncvc-521-08-2024
1. ) CHONG KOK SIONG 2. ) TEE AI LING 3. ) HON KAH SHIN 4. ) CHOW LAI LAI 5. ) SAH THIAM LEONG 6. ) LOW HUEY SUAN v MAWAR AWAL (M) SDN BHD
MYHC 18 March 2025
See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.
About Tee Ai Ling
Tee Ai Ling appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning March 2025 to March 2025. Tee Ai Ling appeared as plaintiff in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).
How many court cases involve Tee Ai Ling?
Tee Ai Ling appears in 1 published judgment from March 2025 to March 2025. Most commonly as plaintiff (1 cases).
Practice Areas
1 This is an application by the Plaintiffs for a summary judgement to be entered against the Defendant (Enclosure 6) pursuant to Order 14 of the Rules of Court 2012 (ROC). 1 2 The Plaintiffs are claiming for liquidated ascertained damages (LAD) for late delivery of vacant possession and completing common facilities of condominium by the Defendant. 1 3 The Defendant is a developer of a housing project known as “Mulberi Kondominium” (Project). 1 4 The well-established legal principles applicable to applications for summary judgment have been clearly and expressly deliberated as provided by statutory provisions and decided cases. 1 5 This Court finds that the matter in question is only about the calculation of the LAD and which calculation, whether the Plaintiffs or the Defendant, as correct? In this regard, this Court finds that the calculation of the Defendant has a basis and had given such order accordingly. 1 6 After careful scrutiny and judicious consideration of all the evidence before this Court, including the written and oral submissions of both parties, this Court in allowing Enclosure 6 has ordered the Defendant to pay as follows- 1 “1. Gantirugi tetap yang berjumlah RM 556,560.00 dibayar oleh Defendan kepada Plaintif Pertama dan Plaintif Ke-2; 2. Gantirugi tetap yang berjumlah RM 580,411.28 dibayar oleh Defendan kepada Plaintif Ke-3 dan Plaintif Ke-4; 3. Gantirugi tetap yang berjumlah RM 487,851.16 dibayar oleh Defendan kepada Plaintif Ke-5 dan Plaintif Ke-6; 4. Faedah atas perenggan-perenggan 1-3 di atas pada kadar 5% setahun dari tarikh tuntutan ini iaitu pada 5-8-2024 sehingga pembayaran penuh dan muktamad dibayar oleh Defendan kepada Plaintif-Plaintif; dan kos...”. 1