S

Seripah binti Abdul Rahman

Person 1 case

Seripah binti Abdul Rahman appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:

wa-22ncvc-276-05-2025
1. ) NOORMAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN 2. ) ZURAIDAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN 3. ) NORLIAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN 4. ) SERIPAH BINTI ABDUL RAHMAN 5. ) NORIZAN BINTI ABD RAHMAN 6. ) ADNAN BIN KAMARUDDIN 7. ) MUHAMMAD AZZAT BIN ADNAN 8. ) NUR MUHAMMAD BIN ADNAN 9. ) FARAH ADLINA BINTI ADNAN 10. ) FARAH WAHEEDA BINTI ADNAN v ASFARANI BINTI ARSHAD (sebagai Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Arshad bin Abd Rahman, simati yang telah meninggal dunia pada 01/09/2015)
MYHC 4 December 2025

See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.

About Seripah binti Abdul Rahman

Seripah binti Abdul Rahman appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning December 2025 to December 2025. Seripah binti Abdul Rahman appeared as plaintiff in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).

How many court cases involve Seripah binti Abdul Rahman?

Seripah binti Abdul Rahman appears in 1 published judgment from December 2025 to December 2025. Most commonly as plaintiff (1 cases).

Practice Areas

This judgment concerns a striking out application in an estate dispute following the deaths of spouses Aminah and Arshad. The Plaintiffs, beneficiaries under Arshad's estate, claimed entitlement to a 30.56% share in two properties allegedly excluded from the Settlement Agreement. The Defendant, as administrator sought to strike out the claim, contending that the Agreement constituted a full and final settlement. The Court held that it had jurisdiction because the dispute concerned the interpretation of a civil contract, not the determination of Islamic inheritance. The Court found that the Plaintiffs had only one entitlement—their fractional faraid shares, which already incorporated Arshad's subdivided portion—not two separate entitlements as claimed. The Agreement comprehensively covered both estates and the disputed properties. Finding that the claim disclosed no reasonable cause of action, was vexatious, and constituted an abuse of process, the Court allowed the striking-out application with costs. 1 Striking out; Settlement agreement; Faraid; Estoppel; Contract interpretation; O 18 R 19 ROC 2012; Abuse of process 1

Plaintiff (1)

wa-22ncvc-276-05-2025 MYHC
1. ) NOORMAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN 2. ) ZURAIDAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN 3. ) NORLIAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN 4. ) SERIPAH BINTI ABDUL RAHMAN 5. ) NORIZAN BINTI ABD RAHMAN 6. ) ADNAN BIN KAMARUDDIN 7. ) MUHAMMAD AZZAT BIN ADNAN 8. ) NUR MUHAMMAD BIN ADNAN 9. ) FARAH ADLINA BINTI ADNAN 10. ) FARAH WAHEEDA BINTI ADNAN v ASFARANI BINTI ARSHAD (sebagai Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Arshad bin Abd Rahman, simati yang telah meninggal dunia pada 01/09/2015)
4 December 2025