1. ) NOORMAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN 2. ) ZURAIDAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN 3. ) NORLIAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN 4. ) SERIPAH BINTI ABDUL RAHMAN 5. ) NORIZAN BINTI ABD RAHMAN 6. ) ADNAN BIN KAMARUDDIN 7. ) MUHAMMAD AZZAT BIN ADNAN 8. ) NUR MUHAMMAD BIN ADNAN 9. ) FARAH ADLINA BINTI ADNAN 10. ) FARAH WAHEEDA BINTI ADNAN v ASFARANI BINTI ARSHAD (sebagai Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Arshad bin Abd Rahman, simati yang telah meninggal dunia pada 01/09/2015)
Catchwords
This judgment concerns a striking out application in an estate dispute following the deaths of spouses Aminah and Arshad. The Plaintiffs, beneficiaries under Arshad's estate, claimed entitlement to a 30.56% share in two properties allegedly excluded from the Settlement Agreement. The Defendant, as administrator sought to strike out the claim, contending that the Agreement constituted a full and final settlement. The Court held that it had jurisdiction because the dispute concerned the interpretation of a civil contract, not the determination of Islamic inheritance. The Court found that the Plaintiffs had only one entitlement—their fractional faraid shares, which already incorporated Arshad's subdivided portion—not two separate entitlements as claimed. The Agreement comprehensively covered both estates and the disputed properties. Finding that the claim disclosed no reasonable cause of action, was vexatious, and constituted an abuse of process, the Court allowed the striking-out application with costs. Striking out; Settlement agreement; Faraid; Estoppel; Contract interpretation; O 18 R 19 ROC 2012; Abuse of process
Practice Areas
This judgment concerns a striking out application in an estate dispute following the deaths of spouses Aminah and Arshad. The Plaintiffs, beneficiaries under Arshad's estate, claimed entitlement to a 30.56% share in two properties allegedly excluded from the Settlement Agreement. The Defendant, as administrator sought to strike out the claim, contending that the Agreement constituted a full and final settlement. The Court held that it had jurisdiction because the dispute concerned the interpretation of a civil contract, not the determination of Islamic inheritance. The Court found that the Plaintiffs had only one entitlement—their fractional faraid shares, which already incorporated Arshad's subdivided portion—not two separate entitlements as claimed. The Agreement comprehensively covered both estates and the disputed properties. Finding that the claim disclosed no reasonable cause of action, was vexatious, and constituted an abuse of process, the Court allowed the striking-out application with costs. Striking out; Settlement agreement; Faraid; Estoppel; Contract interpretation; O 18 R 19 ROC 2012; Abuse of process
Judges (1)
Parties (11)
Adnan bin Kamaruddin Plaintiff Asfarani binti Arshad Defendant Farah Adlina binti Adnan Plaintiff Farah Waheeda binti Adnan Plaintiff Muhammad Azzat bin Adnan Plaintiff Noormah binti Abd Rahman Plaintiff Norizan binti Abd Rahman Plaintiff Norliah binti Abd Rahman Plaintiff Nur Muhammad bin Adnan Plaintiff Seripah binti Abdul Rahman Plaintiff Zuraidah binti Abd Rahman Plaintiff
Case Significance
1. ) NOORMAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN 2. ) ZURAIDAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN 3. ) NORLIAH BIN... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated December 4, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-276-05-2025). The case was decided by Arziah binti Mohamed Apandi.
Key issues: Striking out; Settlement agreement; Faraid; Estoppel; Contract interpretation; O 18 R 19 ROC 2012; Abuse of process.
What was the outcome of 1. ) NOORMAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN 2. ) ZURAIDAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN 3. ) NORLIAH BIN...?
1. ) NOORMAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN 2. ) ZURAIDAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN 3. ) NORLIAH BIN... is a High Court decision dated December 4, 2025. The case was heard by Arziah binti Mohamed Apandi. See the full judgment for details.