M

Md Ibrahim Marican bin Md David Marican

Person 1 case

Md Ibrahim Marican bin Md David Marican appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:

wa-21ncvc-80-04-2021
1. ) DATIN PADUKA DR. TAN YEE KEW 2. ) VIJAYA KUMARI A/P KANNIPAN 3. ) LEE CHUN TACK 4. ) RAZALI BIN ABU BAKAR 5. ) ASMUNI BIN NAFIAH 6. ) DEWI MURNI HARUN 7. ) VASANDA A/P VYTHILIGAM 8. ) MOHAMED NOORSYAFIQ BIN SHAMSUDIN 9. ) THULOSIMANY 10. ) SABRINA BINTI SAHUL HAMID 11. ) KALADEVI A/P RAMACHANTHIRAN 12. ) VELLAMMAL A/P VADAMALAY 13. ) RAJA NORSIDAH BT RAJA ABDUL JALIL 14. ) SITI NORWANA BINTI ZAKARIA 15. ) NUR AFIQAH BINIL MOHTAR APANDI 16. ) TAMIL SELVI A/P SUBRAMANIAM 17. ) MUNIAMAH A/P...
MYHC 3 November 2025

See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.

About Md Ibrahim Marican bin Md David Marican

Md Ibrahim Marican bin Md David Marican appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning November 2025 to November 2025. Md Ibrahim Marican bin Md David Marican appeared as plaintiff in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).

How many court cases involve Md Ibrahim Marican bin Md David Marican?

Md Ibrahim Marican bin Md David Marican appears in 1 published judgment from November 2025 to November 2025. Most commonly as plaintiff (1 cases).

Practice Areas

This judgment dismisses a tort action by 810 plaintiffs against 18 defendants arising from a September 2020 water disruption in Wangsa Maju, Kuala Lumpur. The High Court determined the threshold issue of locus standi after the first plaintiff (PW-1), a former Member of Parliament, testified as sole witness. The Court held this was a private law tort action requiring strict standing requirements, not public interest litigation. PW-1 lacked personal standing, having resided outside the affected area with no personal water disruption. The action failed as a representative proceeding under Order 15 Rule 12 ROC 2012, lacked endorsement under Order 6 Rule 2(1)(b) and proper authorization. The remaining 809 plaintiffs adduced no evidence and defects emerged where 103 plaintiffs with non-existent identity card numbers, 8 deceased plaintiffs, 3 undischarged bankrupts without DGI sanction, and 8 residing outside the affected area. PW-1 admitted inability to prove any claim and lacked written authorisation from the plaintiffs. 1 Locus standi; representative action; tort; private law standing; Order 15 Rule 12; Order 6 Rule 2(1)(b); costs 1

Plaintiff (1)

wa-21ncvc-80-04-2021 MYHC
1. ) DATIN PADUKA DR. TAN YEE KEW 2. ) VIJAYA KUMARI A/P KANNIPAN 3. ) LEE CHUN TACK 4. ) RAZALI BIN ABU BAKAR 5. ) ASMUNI BIN NAFIAH 6. ) DEWI MURNI HARUN 7. ) VASANDA A/P VYTHILIGAM 8. ) MOHAMED NOORSYAFIQ BIN SHAMSUDIN 9. ) THULOSIMANY 10. ) SABRINA BINTI SAHUL HAMID 11. ) KALADEVI A/P RAMACHANTHIRAN 12. ) VELLAMMAL A/P VADAMALAY 13. ) RAJA NORSIDAH BT RAJA ABDUL JALIL 14. ) SITI NORWANA BINTI ZAKARIA 15. ) NUR AFIQAH BINIL MOHTAR APANDI 16. ) TAMIL SELVI A/P SUBRAMANIAM 17. ) MUNIAMAH A/P...
3 November 2025