D
Dato' Ahmad Feisal bin Ahmad Tajuddin)
Person 1 case
Dato' Ahmad Feisal bin Ahmad Tajuddin) appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:
wa-24ncvc-1747-04-2025
Dato' Ahmad Feisal bin Ahmad Tajuddin (mendakwa sebagai pemangku presiden dan/atau naib presiden Persatuan Kriket Malaysia (1990)) v 1. ) Mohammed Iqbal Ali bin Kassim Ali 2. ) Dr Arun Kumar Beshamber Nath 3. ) Amarjeet Singh a/l Wazir Singh 4. ) Mahnorizal bin Mahat 5. ) Ahmad Salman bin Othman
MYHC 6 July 2025
See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.
About Dato' Ahmad Feisal bin Ahmad Tajuddin)
Dato' Ahmad Feisal bin Ahmad Tajuddin) appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning July 2025 to July 2025. Dato' Ahmad Feisal bin Ahmad Tajuddin) appeared as applicant in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).
How many court cases involve Dato' Ahmad Feisal bin Ahmad Tajuddin)?
Dato' Ahmad Feisal bin Ahmad Tajuddin) appears in 1 published judgment from July 2025 to July 2025. Most commonly as applicant (1 cases).
Practice Areas
1 This is a dispute regarding the validity of resignations and/or withdrawals of former members of the Executive Committee ("EXCO") of the Malaysia Cricket Association ("MCA"). It has resulted in the Originating Summons Enclosure 1 being filed. 1 2 In the meantime, the plaintiff is seeking an interim interlocutory injunction through Enclosure 2 pending the disposal of Enclosure 1. However, while Enclosure 2 is being dealt with, the plaintiff demands an ad interim injunction. 1 3 As regards Enclosure 2, the plaintiff seeks to restrain the first defendant from holding himself out as the President and/or affiliate committee members of the MCA, to restrain the second defendant from holding himself out as the Deputy President and/or affiliate committee member of the MCA, to prevent the third defendant from holding himself out as the Honorary Treasurer and/or affiliated committee member as well as to restrain the fourth and fifth defendants from holding themselves out as the affiliates committee members of the MCA. 1 4 The court, in this regard, is unable to find any evidence that the defendants played a role that would warrant an injunction. To this end, the Court does not find any evidence of the defendants holding themselves out as the plaintiff suggested. As a result, the plaintiff does not make out a sufficient case for this injunction. 1 5 In view of the same, Enclosure 2 is therefore dismissed with costs of RM2,000.00 to each defendant, subject to allocatur. 1