Dato' Ahmad Feisal bin Ahmad Tajuddin (mendakwa sebagai pemangku presiden dan/atau naib presiden Persatuan Kriket Malaysia (1990)) v 1. ) Mohammed Iqbal Ali bin Kassim Ali 2. ) Dr Arun Kumar Beshamber Nath 3. ) Amarjeet Singh a/l Wazir Singh 4. ) Mahnorizal bin Mahat 5. ) Ahmad Salman bin Othman
Catchwords
[1] This is a dispute regarding the validity of resignations and/or withdrawals of former members of the Executive Committee ("EXCO") of the Malaysia Cricket Association ("MCA"). It has resulted in the Originating Summons [Enclosure 1] being filed. [2] In the meantime, the plaintiff is seeking an interim interlocutory injunction through Enclosure 2 pending the disposal of Enclosure 1. However, while Enclosure 2 is being dealt with, the plaintiff demands an ad interim injunction. [3] As regards Enclosure 2, the plaintiff seeks to restrain the first defendant from holding himself out as the President and/or affiliate committee members of the MCA, to restrain the second defendant from holding himself out as the Deputy President and/or affiliate committee member of the MCA, to prevent the third defendant from holding himself out as the Honorary Treasurer and/or affiliated committee member as well as to restrain the fourth and fifth defendants from holding themselves out as the affiliates committee members of the MCA. [4] The court, in this regard, is unable to find any evidence that the defendants played a role that would warrant an injunction. To this end, the Court does not find any evidence of the defendants holding themselves out as the plaintiff suggested. As a result, the plaintiff does not make out a sufficient case for this injunction. [5] In view of the same, Enclosure 2 is therefore dismissed with costs of RM2,000.00 to each defendant, subject to allocatur.
Practice Areas
1 This is a dispute regarding the validity of resignations and/or withdrawals of former members of the Executive Committee ("EXCO") of the Malaysia Cricket Association ("MCA"). It has resulted in the Originating Summons Enclosure 1 being filed. 2 In the meantime, the plaintiff is seeking an interim interlocutory injunction through Enclosure 2 pending the disposal of Enclosure 1. However, while Enclosure 2 is being dealt with, the plaintiff demands an ad interim injunction. 3 As regards Enclosure 2, the plaintiff seeks to restrain the first defendant from holding himself out as the President and/or affiliate committee members of the MCA, to restrain the second defendant from holding himself out as the Deputy President and/or affiliate committee member of the MCA, to prevent the third defendant from holding himself out as the Honorary Treasurer and/or affiliated committee member as well as to restrain the fourth and fifth defendants from holding themselves out as the affiliates committee members of the MCA. 4 The court, in this regard, is unable to find any evidence that the defendants played a role that would warrant an injunction. To this end, the Court does not find any evidence of the defendants holding themselves out as the plaintiff suggested. As a result, the plaintiff does not make out a sufficient case for this injunction. 5 In view of the same, Enclosure 2 is therefore dismissed with costs of RM2,000.00 to each defendant, subject to allocatur.
Case Significance
Dato' Ahmad Feisal bin Ahmad Tajuddin (mendakwa sebagai pemangku presiden dan... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated July 6, 2025 (citation: wa-24ncvc-1747-04-2025). The case was decided by Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan.
Key issues: [5] In view of the same, Enclosure 2 is therefore dismissed with costs of RM2,000.00 to each defendant, subject to allocatur..
What was the outcome of Dato' Ahmad Feisal bin Ahmad Tajuddin (mendakwa sebagai pemangku presiden dan...?
Dato' Ahmad Feisal bin Ahmad Tajuddin (mendakwa sebagai pemangku presiden dan... is a High Court decision dated July 6, 2025. The case was heard by Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan. See the full judgment for details.