T

TETUAN AMRAN JOSEPH, CHAN & CO

Organisation 3 cases

About TETUAN AMRAN JOSEPH, CHAN & CO

TETUAN AMRAN JOSEPH, CHAN & CO appears in 3 reported Malaysia court cases (2025–2026). TETUAN AMRAN JOSEPH, CHAN & CO is recorded as Defendant (3). These cases were heard before MYHC (3).

On the court record

A party firm in civil proceedings turning on setting aside default judgments, case-management striking out under Order 34, and the citation procedure for challenging a grant of probate.

Tetuan Amran Joseph, Chan & Co appears in the corpus as a named defendant in civil proceedings that turn on default judgments, case-management compliance, and the procedure for challenging a grant of probate.

One matter, framed in Bahasa Malaysia, concerned an application to set aside a perintah penghakiman ingkar (judgment in default order) and to enter a defence. The court's framing recorded a defence said to be meritorious, an irregularity described as luar aturan (out of the rules), and a criticism of a sikap sambil lewa (a casual or indifferent attitude) in the conduct of the matter.

A second matter concerned procedural non-compliance and striking out under Order 34 of the Rules of Court 2012. The court recorded that, where parties repeatedly failed to comply with case-management directions and remained absent from pre-trial proceedings despite indulgences, the court is empowered under Order 34 rules 1(3), 2(3) and 6(1) to strike out the defences; the defendants' conduct amounted to procedural abuse, the defences were struck out, and judgment was entered in full for the plaintiffs.

A third matter concerned an application to strike out a writ and statement of claim, alleging non-compliance with Order 72 rule 7 of the Rules of Court 2012 for failure to issue a citation before commencing a writ to revoke a grant of probate. The court considered whether an application under Order 18 rule 19(1)(d) was sustainable without a supporting affidavit, whether the statement of claim disclosed a reasonable cause of action based on pleaded facts of fraud, and whether a citation subsequently filed cured the procedural lapse under Order 2 rule 1.

These proceedings show the firm as a party in litigation about default judgments, case-management discipline and probate procedure. The narrative names the party firm, refers to natural persons by role, and states outcomes only as recorded.

How many Malaysia court cases involve TETUAN AMRAN JOSEPH, CHAN & CO?

TETUAN AMRAN JOSEPH, CHAN & CO appears in 3 reported Malaysia court cases (2025–2026).

Which courts does TETUAN AMRAN JOSEPH, CHAN & CO appear in?

TETUAN AMRAN JOSEPH, CHAN & CO appears before MYHC (3).

What did the court decide on the struck-out defences?

It held that repeated non-compliance with case-management directions and absence from pre-trial proceedings amounted to procedural abuse, struck out the defences under Order 34 rules 1(3), 2(3) and 6(1) of the Rules of Court 2012, and entered judgment for the plaintiffs.

What probate-procedure question arose in the strike-out matter?

Whether failure to issue a citation before commencing a writ to revoke a grant of probate under Order 72 rule 7 was fatal, and whether a citation subsequently filed cured the lapse under Order 2 rule 1.

Practice Areas

Defendant (3)