1. ) PARVATHY A/P SUBRAMANIAM 2. ) VASANTHI A/P RAMAN v 1. ) SAKTHIVEL NAGALINGAM 2. ) JOSEPH A/L SEBESTIAN 3. ) TETUAN AMRAN JOSEPH, CHAN & CO. 4. ) SHAHRIL BIN LAMIN 5. ) TETUAN LAMIN & CO.

aa-23ncvc-7-07-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 19 June 2025 • AA-23NCvC-7-07/2024

Catchwords

Procedural non-compliance – Striking-out under O 34 – Persistent default – Non-attendance – Pre-trial directions ignored – Defendant's defence struck out – Judgment entered for plaintiffs– Where parties repeatedly failed to comply with case-management directions under O 34 r 1(1) and r 2(2) of the Rules of Court 2012, and remained absent from pre-trial proceedings despite indulgences, the Court is empowered under O 34 r 1(3), r 2(3) and r 6(1) to strike out the defences – Defendants' conduct amounted to procedural abuse – Court invoked its case-management jurisdiction to enter judgment in full for the plaintiffs

Practice Areas

Procedural non-compliance

Judges (1)

Moses Susayan Delivered

Parties (7)

TETUAN AMRAN JOSEPH, CHAN & CO Defendant TETUAN LAMIN & CO Defendant Joseph a/l Sebestian Defendant Parvathy a/p Subramaniam Plaintiff Sakthivel Nagalingam Defendant Shahril bin Lamin Defendant Vasanthi a/p Raman Plaintiff

Case Significance

1. ) PARVATHY A/P SUBRAMANIAM 2. ) VASANTHI A/P RAMAN v 1. ) SAKTHIVEL NAGALI... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 19, 2025 (citation: aa-23ncvc-7-07-2024). The case was decided by Moses Susayan.

What was the outcome of 1. ) PARVATHY A/P SUBRAMANIAM 2. ) VASANTHI A/P RAMAN v 1. ) SAKTHIVEL NAGALI...?

1. ) PARVATHY A/P SUBRAMANIAM 2. ) VASANTHI A/P RAMAN v 1. ) SAKTHIVEL NAGALI... is a High Court decision dated June 19, 2025. The case was heard by Moses Susayan. See the full judgment for details.