P

PESURUHJAYA TANAH PERSEKUTUAN

Organisation 4 cases

About PESURUHJAYA TANAH PERSEKUTUAN

PESURUHJAYA TANAH PERSEKUTUAN appears as a party in 4 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning January 2025 to September 2025. PESURUHJAYA TANAH PERSEKUTUAN appeared as defendant in 2 cases, respondent in 1 case, third party in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (3), Court of Appeal (1).

How many court cases involve PESURUHJAYA TANAH PERSEKUTUAN?

PESURUHJAYA TANAH PERSEKUTUAN appears in 4 published judgments from January 2025 to September 2025. Most commonly as defendant (2 cases).

Practice Areas

Sale and purchase agreement of palm oil land; delivery of vacant possession; encroachment by neighbouring lots; de minimis rule; waiver of encroachment; unjust enrichment; 1 Mandamus 1 1 This is the Plaintiff’s Application for Discovery (Enclosure 14) under Order 24 Rule 3 and/or Rule 7 and/or Order 12 of the Rules of Court 2012 (ROC 2012). 1 2 This Court allows Enclosure 14 in part, by allowing only the valuation report dated 19.05.2020 pertaining to a land held under HSD 3457, PT 457, Mukim Klang, Daerah Klang, Negeri Selangor (Land) but not Minutes of the Cabinet meeting. The reasons are as deliberated. 1 3 Accordingly, this Court is of the view that the valuation report is adequate in regards to the issue pertaining to the purchase price and the reason for the revaluation of the Land. 1 4 After a thorough and careful evaluation of all the evidence presented, including the written and oral submissions by learned Counsels, this Court allows Enclosure 14 in part by allowing only the Valuation Report dated 19.05.2020. 1 Orders of this Court 48 Based on the evidence and the assessment as stated above, with the application of the relevant laws, this Court finds that the Plaintiff has proven his claim on a balance of probabilities. Therefore, this Court’s orders are as follows: (a) The 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants have breached the revised sale and purchase agreement pertaining to the Land 1 (b) The 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants have wrongfully terminated the revised sale and purchase agreement pertaining to the Land 1

Defendant (2)

Respondent (1)

Third Party (1)