P

Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Petaling

Organisation 8 cases

About Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Petaling

Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Petaling appears as a party in 8 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning September 2014 to November 2025. Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Petaling appeared as respondent in 4 cases, defendant in 2 cases, appellant in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (7), Court of Appeal (1).

How many court cases involve Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Petaling?

Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Petaling appears in 8 published judgments from September 2014 to November 2025. Most commonly as respondent (4 cases).

In which Malaysian courts has Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Petaling appeared?

Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Petaling has appeared across High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (7 cases) and Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) (1 cases), totaling 8 judgments.

Practice Areas

Right to property 1 Enclosure 20 was the Applicant’s application to amend their Form N dated 3.7.2023 by including new grounds of objection. Applicant failed to show sufficient reasons as there was inordinate delay. 1 Plaintiff entered into a sale and purchase agreement to sell property to Defendant-Defendant sued for specific performance of the SPA when Plaintiff refused to honour agreement-specific performance ordered by court vide judgment in default in 2012-Plaintiff applied to set aside judgment in default-failed-appeal to Court of Appeal withdrawn-judgment for specific performance becomes final between parties-meanwhile Plaintiff transferred land to third party-Defendant sued Plaintiff for order that land be transferred to it following the SPA entered earlier-judgment given to Defendant-Plaintiff’s appeal to Court of Appeal dismissed-leave to Federal Court also dismissed-Plaintiff now sues to impeach judgment in 2012 on grounds of fraud-whether res judicata applies as facts upon which fraud was based could have been raised in the application to set aside judgment in 2012-whether judicial estoppel applies as the Plaintiff is taking inconsistent stand with earlier suit. 1 Saman Pemula ini merupakan permohonan oleh Plaintiff yang antara lain untuk membatalkan suatu gadaian pihak ketiga serta satu perintah bahawa lelongan hartanah terlibat yang dibuat oleh Defendan Kedua dan yang dibida oleh Defendan Ketiga dibatalkan dengan efek serta-merta. 1 Isu pokok untuk pertimbangan Mahkamah ini menjurus kepada persoalan sama ada gadaian yang didaftarkan atas nama pemegang gadaian adalah tidak sah, terbatal dan tiada kesan undang-undang. 1 1. Permohonan Interlokutori: Permohonan defendan ketiga untuk menggantung prosiding dan pelaksanaan perintah sehingga Saman Pemula No. BA-24NCVC-743-04/2025 (Guaman 743) di Mahkamah Tinggi Shah Alam dilupuskan. Defendan kedua dan ketiga, pasangan suami isteri dan peminjam-peminjam kepada plaintif di bawah beberapa kemudahan pinjaman. Selaras dengan terma gadaian, plaintif telah mengambil tindakan halang tebus ke atas hartanah-hartanah tersebut 1 1. This is an appeal by way of Originating Summons (Enclosure 1) brought by the Plaintiff against a decision of the Second Defendant, the Land Administrator, dated 23 May 2023. The decision in question was the granting of an Order for Sale in respect of the property held under PM 459 Lot 21270, Mukim Damansara, Negeri Selangor, located at No. 9, Jalan PJS 10/24, Taman Sri Subang, 46000 Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan. 1 2. The Plaintiff sought, inter alia, to set aside the Order for Sale and all consequential actions and orders arising therefrom, including a public auction held on 21 November 2024. 1

Respondent (4)

Applicant (1)

Appellant (1)

Defendant (2)