VISIBER SDN BHD v 1. ) Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Petaling 2. ) KOK LOW KAU
Catchwords
At the core of the Plaintiff’s application in Enclosure 1 lies a principal request. The relief sought is the immediate withdrawal and cancellation of the Registrar’s Caveat. In addition, the Plaintiff seeks further reliefs specifically directed against the Second Defendant. The submissions exchanged between the parties reveal a striking feature, that is, each side accuses the other of resorting to a 'backdoor approach' in pursuit of their respective objectives. These allegations underscore the contentious and tactical nature of the proceedings. The principal issues are: First, whether the Plaintiff is entitled to have the Registrar’s Caveat withdrawn and cancelled; and Second, whether the Plaintiff is entitled to general, exemplary and injunctive reliefs against the Second Defendant. In determining the first of the two principal issues, questions that have arisen include (i) whether the Plaintiff is entitled to rely on the doctrine of res judicata; and (ii) whether fraud has been established, as averred by the Defendants.
Practice Areas
At the core of the Plaintiff’s application in Enclosure 1 lies a principal request. The relief sought is the immediate withdrawal and cancellation of the Registrar’s Caveat. In addition, the Plaintiff seeks further reliefs specifically directed against the Second Defendant. The submissions exchanged between the parties reveal a striking feature, that is, each side accuses the other of resorting to a 'backdoor approach' in pursuit of their respective objectives. These allegations underscore the contentious and tactical nature of the proceedings. The principal issues are: First, whether the Plaintiff is entitled to have the Registrar’s Caveat withdrawn and cancelled; and Second, whether the Plaintiff is entitled to general, exemplary and injunctive reliefs against the Second Defendant. In determining the first of the two principal issues, questions that have arisen include (i) whether the Plaintiff is entitled to rely on the doctrine of res judicata; and (ii) whether fraud has been established, as averred by the Defendants.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
VISIBER SDN BHD v 1. ) Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Petaling 2. ) KOK LOW KAU is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 30, 2025 (citation: ba-24ncvc-771-04-2025). The case was decided by Choong Yeow Choy.
What was the outcome of VISIBER SDN BHD v 1. ) Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Petaling 2. ) KOK LOW KAU?
VISIBER SDN BHD v 1. ) Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Petaling 2. ) KOK LOW KAU is a High Court decision dated June 30, 2025. The case was heard by Choong Yeow Choy. See the full judgment for details.