M
MENTERI BESAR SELANGOR (PEMERBADANAN)
Organisation 4 cases
About MENTERI BESAR SELANGOR (PEMERBADANAN)
MENTERI BESAR SELANGOR (PEMERBADANAN) appears as a party in 4 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning April 2021 to January 2026. MENTERI BESAR SELANGOR (PEMERBADANAN) appeared as respondent in 2 cases, appellant in 1 case, defendant in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (3), Federal Court (1).
How many court cases involve MENTERI BESAR SELANGOR (PEMERBADANAN)?
MENTERI BESAR SELANGOR (PEMERBADANAN) appears in 4 published judgments from April 2021 to January 2026. Most commonly as respondent (2 cases).
Practice Areas
A claim for recovery brought by the Menteri Besar Selangor (Pemerbadanan) against its former employees for the Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) that was wrongly paid. 1 Appeal on striking out 1 Kes rujukan tanah. Pemohon membantah kepada kecukupan awad Responden untuk nilai tanah, pecah pisah, kesan mudarat dan kos sampingan Mahkamah membenarkan peningkatan nilai tanah dan mengarahkan bayaran pampasan tambahan untuk nilai tanah dan pecah pisah. Tuntutan untuk kesan mudarat dan kos sampingan ditolak. 1 This judgment dismisses a tort action by 810 plaintiffs against 18 defendants arising from a September 2020 water disruption in Wangsa Maju, Kuala Lumpur. The High Court determined the threshold issue of locus standi after the first plaintiff (PW-1), a former Member of Parliament, testified as sole witness. The Court held this was a private law tort action requiring strict standing requirements, not public interest litigation. PW-1 lacked personal standing, having resided outside the affected area with no personal water disruption. The action failed as a representative proceeding under Order 15 Rule 12 ROC 2012, lacked endorsement under Order 6 Rule 2(1)(b) and proper authorization. The remaining 809 plaintiffs adduced no evidence and defects emerged where 103 plaintiffs with non-existent identity card numbers, 8 deceased plaintiffs, 3 undischarged bankrupts without DGI sanction, and 8 residing outside the affected area. PW-1 admitted inability to prove any claim and lacked written authorisation from the plaintiffs. 1 Locus standi; representative action; tort; private law standing; Order 15 Rule 12; Order 6 Rule 2(1)(b); costs 1
Appellant (1)
Defendant (1)
Respondent (2)
ba-12ancvc-49-10-2024 MYHC
SIOW HON PENG v 1. ) PERMODALAN NEGERI SELANGOR BERHAD 2. ) Menteri Besar Selangor (Pemerbadanan)
10 April 2025
02f-31-04-2019b MYFC
1. FAEKAH BINTI HAJI HUSIN (NO. K/P: 650602-10-5008) 2. ROHANY BINTI DATO’ TALIB (NO. K/P: 481012-71-5346) 3. ARFA’EZA BINTI ABDUL AZIZ (NO. K/P: 700118-10-5228) 4. MUSTAPHA BIN MOHD TALIB (NO. K/P: 640221-01-5931) 5. RAHIMAH BINTI KAMARUDIN (NO. K/P: 531220-04-5060) 6. ABDUL HALIM MOHAMED YUSOF (NO. K/P: 660620-01-5371) 7. TUAN NAZURI TUAN ISMAIL (NO. K/P: 750116-11-5137) v MENTERI BESAR SELANGOR (PEMERBADANAN)
18 April 2021