KAISAR MAXIM Sdn Bhd
About KAISAR MAXIM Sdn Bhd
KAISAR MAXIM Sdn Bhd appears in 3 reported Malaysia court cases (2025). KAISAR MAXIM Sdn Bhd is recorded as Respondent (1), Appellant (1) and Proposed Intervener (1). These cases were heard before MYHC (2) and MYCOA (1).
On the court record
Shows a developer contending with purchasers over delivery obligations under Schedule H and with neighbouring landowners over the grant and suspension of planning approvals.
Kaisar Maxim Sdn Bhd appears in the reported judgments as a property developer litigating in the High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) and the Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) across a housing-purchaser claim and a planning-law dispute over a development order. Its matters engage two distinct regulatory frameworks — the statutory housing-sale regime and the planning-approval regime for development on land.
In one decision the company was a respondent to a purchaser appeal that turned on the legal effect of an extension of time granted by the housing authority. The court's task was to apply the Federal Court's decision in Obata-Ambak Holdings Sdn Bhd v Prema Bonanza Sdn Bhd and to determine whether the purchasers had a sustainable statutory claim under Schedule H of the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Regulations 1989 — the recurring question of whether an authority-granted extension defeats a purchaser's claim for late-delivery damages.
The planning strand concerns a development order issued by the local authority for a development on land under section 22(2) of the Federal Territory (Planning) Act 1982. In a Court of Appeal decision the question was whether the High Court, on an application for judicial review of that development order, had the power under Order 53 rule 3(5) of the Rules of Court 2012 to grant a stay of the order pending disposal of the review, in favour of an owner and occupier of neighbouring land. A related High Court decision recorded that a neighbouring owner's application for a stay of the local authority's decision granting the development order to the company was heard and allowed with costs, over the opposition of both the authority and the company. Together the decisions show a developer contending with purchasers over delivery obligations on one hand, and with neighbouring landowners over the grant and suspension of planning approvals on the other.
How many Malaysia court cases involve KAISAR MAXIM Sdn Bhd?
KAISAR MAXIM Sdn Bhd appears in 3 reported Malaysia court cases (2025).
Which courts does KAISAR MAXIM Sdn Bhd appear in?
KAISAR MAXIM Sdn Bhd appears before MYHC (2) and MYCOA (1).
What housing-law question did the purchaser appeal against Kaisar Maxim Sdn Bhd raise?
The legal effect of an extension of time granted by the housing authority, applying the Federal Court's decision in Obata-Ambak Holdings Sdn Bhd v Prema Bonanza Sdn Bhd, and whether the purchasers had a sustainable statutory claim under Schedule H of the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Regulations 1989.
What planning-law issue arose over the development order?
Whether the High Court, on judicial review of a development order issued under section 22(2) of the Federal Territory (Planning) Act 1982, had power under Order 53 rule 3(5) of the Rules of Court 2012 to stay the order pending the review, in favour of a neighbouring owner and occupier.