1. ) CHONG NGIT SOOI 2. ) HO PEAK HWA 3. ) YEE CHUNG TUCK 4. ) YEE YING YING 5. ) TAY JEAN SEAN 6. ) TAY CHOON HOW 7. ) PANG JIAN YONG 8. ) PANG TSE FUI 9. ) TAN HOON THEAN 10. ) TAN NING PEI 11. ) SOW TIAP 12. ) TAN NING XIN v KAISAR MAXIM SDN. BHD.

Case Significance

1. ) CHONG NGIT SOOI 2. ) HO PEAK HWA 3. ) YEE CHUNG TUCK 4. ) YEE YING YING ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated December 2, 2025 (citation: ba-12ancvc-39-07-2025). <p>Twelve purchasers of apartments in 'The Address' development appealed against the Sessions Court's dismissal of their LAD claim under Schedule H of the Housing Development Regulations 1989. The High Court allowed the appeal, finding the Sessions Court erred in treating the Federal Court decision in Obata-Ambak as dispositive and that the extension of time granted by the housing authority did not extinguish the purchasers' statutory right to LAD. Summary judgment was entered in favour of the p The case was decided by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat. Counsel appearing: Daniel Bock Jr Wei (counsel for respondent), Low Joo Hean (counsel for appellant).