C
COSMOPOLITAN AVENUE Sdn Bhd
Organisation 4 cases
About COSMOPOLITAN AVENUE Sdn Bhd
COSMOPOLITAN AVENUE Sdn Bhd appears as a party in 4 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning May 2025 to February 2026. COSMOPOLITAN AVENUE Sdn Bhd appeared as defendant in 2 cases, appellant in 1 case, plaintiff in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (3), Court of Appeal (1).
How many court cases involve COSMOPOLITAN AVENUE Sdn Bhd?
COSMOPOLITAN AVENUE Sdn Bhd appears in 4 published judgments from May 2025 to February 2026. Most commonly as defendant (2 cases).
Practice Areas
The appeal concerned liquidated and ascertained damages (LAD) for late delivery of commercial offices. The High Court partly allowed the respondents’ claims, invalidating settlement letters and ordering LAD and a refund. The Court of Appeal held the SPA was a commercial contract outside the Housing Development Act, and LAD must follow its terms. Settlement agreements were valid, and breach of instalments did not void them. The High Court erred on the burden of proof for overpayment; lacking evidence, the refund was set aside. The appeal was allowed in part, varying the High Court’s orders. 1 This is an application by the Defendant pursuant to Order 14 Rules of Court 2012 to enter final judgment against the Plaintiff in respect of its Counterclaim. 2. It is trite that O14 r 5, Rules of Court 2012 allows the Defendant to seek summary judgment against the Plaintiff on its Counterclaim on the ground that the Plaintiff has no defence. 1 CIVIL PROCEDURE: Action-Discontinuance of-Application by plaintiffs to discontinue suit with liberty to file afresh-Defendants objected-Effect of rights of defendants-Injustice-Collateral advantage-Not bona fide-dominus litis-deprivation of advantage-Rules of Court 2012; 0.21 r.3 1 Application to disqulify the Plaintiff's legal firm from acting as the Plaintiff solcitors. Whether the firm's prior representation of the Defendant in matters related to the same development project created a conflict of interest or a risk of misuse of confidential information. Defendant's pplication in Enclosure 6 is allowed. 1