B

BATU KEMAS INDUSTRI Sdn Bhd

Organisation 4 cases

About BATU KEMAS INDUSTRI Sdn Bhd

BATU KEMAS INDUSTRI Sdn Bhd appears in 4 reported Malaysia court cases (2024–2025). BATU KEMAS INDUSTRI Sdn Bhd is recorded as Respondent (3) and Appellant (1). These cases were heard before MYCOA (3) and MYHC (1).

On the court record

A company litigating a stay of winding up under section 492 of the Companies Act 2016 and the assessment of substantial loss — production, profit, replacement and repair — from damage to its industrial operation.

Batu Kemas Industri Sdn Bhd appears in the corpus in company-insolvency and damages litigation, in which the recurring subjects are the stay of a winding-up order and the assessment of loss from damage to an industrial operation. It appears as respondent and appellant across the High Court and Court of Appeal.

The insolvency strand concerns the stay of winding up. In one matter the court considered an application for an interim stay and a stay of winding up under section 492 of the Companies Act 2016, working through the test for such a stay, the rights of creditors, the opposition of financial creditors, and the role of the Official Receiver, and asking whether a stay of the winding-up order ought to be granted. A stay of winding up is an exceptional remedy that pauses the liquidation of a company, and the court's task is to balance the interests of the company seeking to survive against those of the creditors the winding-up process is designed to protect.

The damages strand concerns the quantification of loss from physical damage. At the Court of Appeal an appeal against an assessment addressed the quantum of loss and damage — the loss of goods in production and the profits on them, the loss of production and its profits, the replacement cost of machinery and other equipment physically damaged and the cost of repair — together with the court's discretion to award pre-judgment interest and the date from which it should run. These are the characteristic heads of a substantial industrial-damage claim, where the difficulty lies less in establishing that loss was suffered than in measuring it across production, profit, replacement and repair. The company's footprint combines the survival of a company under threat of winding up with the detailed valuation of the loss caused when its industrial operation is disrupted or damaged, two contexts in which the precise measurement of financial consequences is decisive.

How many Malaysia court cases involve BATU KEMAS INDUSTRI Sdn Bhd?

BATU KEMAS INDUSTRI Sdn Bhd appears in 4 reported Malaysia court cases (2024–2025).

Which courts does BATU KEMAS INDUSTRI Sdn Bhd appear in?

BATU KEMAS INDUSTRI Sdn Bhd appears before MYCOA (3) and MYHC (1).

What insolvency remedy did Batu Kemas Industri's litigation concern?

A stay of winding up under section 492 of the Companies Act 2016 — an exceptional remedy pausing a company's liquidation — with the court weighing the test for a stay, the rights and opposition of financial creditors, and the role of the Official Receiver.

What heads of loss featured in the damages assessment?

The loss of goods in production and the profits on them, the loss of production and its profits, the replacement cost of physically damaged machinery and equipment and the cost of repair, together with the discretion to award pre-judgment interest and the date from which it should run.

Practice Areas

Respondent (3)

Appellant (1)