Wong Yin Mei

On the court record

Wong Yin Mei appears in the reported corpus as a commercial and contract litigator, with injunctions, share sales, corporate capacity and professional-fee disputes among the reported matters. Her injunction work is visible in a matter argued on a judgment in Bahasa Malaysia concerning an injunksi interim (interim injunction) sought ex parte and inter partes, where the court applied the American Cyanamid principles as refined in Keet Gerald Francis — an isu serius untuk dibicarakan (serious issue to be tried), the imbangan kemudahan (balance of convenience), the adequacy of damages, delay, full disclosure, clean hands and abuse of process, together with the requirements for a mandatory injunction and the preservation of the status quo.

Her contract and company work rounds out the picture. She was engaged in a claim for a refund under a share sale agreement founded on the non-fulfilment of conditions precedent, argued around the doctrine of business efficacy and whether a term was a representation, a warranty or an implied term, and in a matter on the locus standi and legal capacity of a dissolved or struck-off company to sue, raised as a preliminary question of law under Order 14A alongside Orders 18 and 33 and the reinstatement provisions of the Companies Act 2016. She also appeared in a Court of Appeal matter on an estate-agency fee under the Valuers, Appraisers, Estate Agents and Property Managers Act 1981 and rule 92(1) of the Estate Agents Rules 1986, turning on whether the agent was the effective cause of the sale, and in a credit-facilities summary-judgment matter on whether the plaintiff had breached the terms by suspending the facility and whether late-interest charges were enforceable. Across these reported decisions her work spans injunctions, share and credit contracts, corporate capacity and professional fees, marking Wong Yin Mei as a commercial and contract litigator of broad range.