R Paramanandan
About R Paramanandan
R Paramanandan appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Malaysia judgments (2024–2025). These were heard before MYHC (4).
On the court record
The reported matters span joint-venture land, banking-recovery and specific-performance work, grounded in High Court judgments.
R Paramanandan's reported matters, argued through Messrs Clarence Edwin Law Offices, cover land and joint-venture disputes, banking recovery and contract, largely in the High Court at Johor Bahru. A substantial land dispute arose from a joint-venture arrangement, in which the pleaded case combined the alleged trespass on land with a suite of agreements, including a joint-venture agreement, a business exit agreement and a consultancy agreement, and allegations of misrepresentation over the rights to manage, work and develop the land. Appearing for a party defending a counterclaim in that litigation, and in a closely related action, he was engaged on the questions of who held the management and development rights and whether the representations relied upon could be sustained.
Banking recovery features in a High Court matter where a bank sought summary judgment under Order 14 of the Rules of Court 2012 against a company and its guarantors; appearing for the plaintiff bank, the Court found that the defendants had failed to show even a single triable issue, including their contention that the personal guarantees were contracts of indemnity, and the plaintiff was entitled to judgment.
Contract completes the profile. In a further High Court matter he appeared for plaintiffs seeking a declaration that certain terms had been established through an exchange of letters, together with an order for specific performance of the resulting obligations, in a dispute connected to sale-and-purchase agreements and an extension of time. A thread across these decisions is the enforcement of commercial and property bargains and the resistance to defences raised against them, whether the dispute concerns development rights under a joint venture, the liability of a guarantor on a facility, or the specific performance of terms agreed in correspondence, argued in the High Court at Johor Bahru. The reported work is characteristically commercial and property-focused, turning on written instruments and the obligations they create, and on holding parties to the bargains recorded in their agreements and correspondence.
How many cases has R Paramanandan appeared in?
R Paramanandan appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Malaysia judgments (2024–2025).
Which courts does R Paramanandan appear in?
R Paramanandan appears before MYHC (4).
What areas of law feature in R Paramanandan's reported cases?
They include land and joint-venture disputes involving trespass and a series of development agreements, banking recovery by way of summary judgment against a company and its guarantors, and contract claims for specific performance.
What did the High Court decide in the bank's summary-judgment application?
Appearing for the plaintiff bank, the Court found the defendants had not shown a single triable issue, including their argument that the personal guarantees were contracts of indemnity, and the bank was entitled to judgment.
What was the contract claim over the exchange of letters?
A claim for a declaration that certain terms had been established through an exchange of letters and for specific performance of the resulting obligations, connected to sale-and-purchase agreements and an extension of time, in which he appeared for the plaintiffs.