Azhar Bin Atan v Tokoh Agro Sdn Bhd BUKAN PIHAK-PIHAK 1. ) Azhar Bin Atan (Mengikut Tuntutan Balas) 2. ) Mohd Shah Bin Manaf (Mengikut Tuntutan Balas) 3. ) Jihan Yusnizan Binti Mohd Yusoff (Mengikut Tunttan Balas) 4. ) Goh Mui Chiuan (Mengikut Tuntutan Balas) 5. ) Sonny Yeow Keng Wan (Mengikut Tuntutan Balas)

ja-22ncvc-16-02-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 30 November 2025 • JA-22NCvC-16-02/2025 • 27 min read
10 cases cited (0 SG, 10 foreign)

Catchwords

undang-undang tanah – pencerobohan tanah – perjanjian usahasama, Business Exit Agreement dan Consultancy Agreement (PU 2022, BEA, CA) – hak pengurusan, pengusahaan dan pemajuan (RMBD) – salah nyata dan penipuan – konflik kepentingan – lucut kelayakan peguamcara – bidang kuasa sedia ada mahkamah – lanjutan masa memfailkan pembelaan – penghakiman ingkar pembelaan – pindaan pembelaan dan tuntutan balas

Practice Areas

undang-undang tanah

Judges (1)

Noradura binti Hamzah Delivered

Counsel (8)

Bahar & Co. Firm Clarence Edwin Law Offices Firm Pang Kiat, Yu Qi Law Chambers Firm Saifuz & Co Firm Baharudin Baharim Counsel Third Party Lim Pang Kiat Counsel Defendant R Paramanandan Counsel Third Party Saiful Zaman Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (3)

Tokoh Agro Sdn Bhd Defendant Azhar bin Atan Plaintiff Jihan Yusnizan binti Mohd Yusoff (mengikut Tunttan Balas) Non Party

Case Significance

Azhar Bin Atan v Tokoh Agro Sdn Bhd BUKAN PIHAK-PIHAK 1. ) Azhar Bin Atan (Me... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated November 30, 2025 (citation: ja-22ncvc-16-02-2025). <p>This action involved two suits heard together concerning land trespass and a joint venture dispute over agricultural land in Kota Tinggi, Johor. Azhar bin Atan sued Tokoh Agro for trespassing on his Malay Reserve land, while Tokoh Agro filed a counterclaim and a related suit was brought by Goh Mon Chiuan and Sonny Yeow. The court dealt with four interlocutory applications including solicitor disqualification, extension of time, default judgment, and amendment of pleadings, granting the amendm The case was decided by Noradura binti Hamzah. Counsel appearing: Baharudin Baharim (counsel third party), Lim Pang Kiat (counsel for defendant), R Paramanandan (counsel third party), Saiful Zaman (counsel for plaintiff).

Summary

This action involved two suits heard together concerning land trespass and a joint venture dispute over agricultural land in Kota Tinggi, Johor. Azhar bin Atan sued Tokoh Agro for trespassing on his Malay Reserve land, while Tokoh Agro filed a counterclaim and a related suit was brought by Goh Mon Chiuan and Sonny Yeow. The court dealt with four interlocutory applications including solicitor disqualification, extension of time, default judgment, and amendment of pleadings, granting the amendment and dismissing others with costs.

What was the outcome of Azhar Bin Atan v Tokoh Agro Sdn Bhd BUKAN PIHAK-PIHAK 1. ) Azhar Bin Atan (Me...?

<p>This action involved two suits heard together concerning land trespass and a joint venture dispute over agricultural land in Kota Tinggi, Johor. Az...

Cases Cited (10)

UK (1)
[1999] 1 AC 222
MY (9)
[1997] 5 MLJ 705 [1998] 4 CLJ 883 [2009] 4 CLJ 303 [2009] 6 MLJ 874 [2010] 2 CLJ 1061 [2013] 7 CLJ 957 [2015] 4 CLJ 247 [2017] 2 CLJ 245 [2018] 5 CLJ 83