Manmohan S Dhillon
About Manmohan S Dhillon
Manmohan S Dhillon appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Malaysia judgments (2024–2025). These were heard before MYHC (3) and MYCOA (1).
On the court record
The reported matters document medical-negligence and patient-injury work, extended into consumer-protection and family litigation, grounded in High Court and Court of Appeal judgments.
Manmohan S Dhillon's reported matters, argued through Messrs PS Ranjan & Co, are strongly concentrated in medical negligence and patient-injury litigation, with related family and consumer-protection work, across the High Court and the Court of Appeal. The clinical-negligence thread is prominent. In a Court of Appeal matter arising from a child born with cerebral palsy said to result from hypoxia during childbirth, the issues were the duty of care of a medical facility and the person in charge, and the court's power to make a reference to medical opinion; appearing for the appellant, the case engaged the standard of care owed by a hospital and its staff. In a High Court medical-negligence suit conducted in Malay, the pleaded questions included whether the plaintiff had come to court with clean hands and in good faith (dengan tangan yang bersih — with clean hands), with the clinical duty of care again in issue; he appeared for the plaintiff.
Consumer protection extends the same patient-safety theme to defective products. In a claim concerning a defective intraocular lens, argued under sections 32, 33, 41, 52, 68, 70(4) and 72(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act 1999, he appeared for the plaintiff, the matter turning on the statutory liability regime for unsafe goods.
Family litigation completes the profile. In an interlocutory application in the Family High Court, a party sought to have the trial judge recused from hearing and deciding the suit, supported by an affidavit from the applicant's solicitor. Across these decisions the reported work is centred on medical negligence and the duty of care in a clinical setting, extended into consumer-protection liability for a defective medical device and into contested family proceedings, argued in the High Court and before the Court of Appeal of Malaysia. What unites the clinical-negligence and consumer-protection matters is a focus on the safety of medical treatment and products, and on where responsibility lies when a patient is injured, whether through the conduct of a hospital and its staff or through a defective device supplied to a consumer.
How many cases has Manmohan S Dhillon appeared in?
Manmohan S Dhillon appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Malaysia judgments (2024–2025).
Which courts does Manmohan S Dhillon appear in?
Manmohan S Dhillon appears before MYHC (3) and MYCOA (1).
What is the focus of Manmohan S Dhillon's reported cases?
They are concentrated in medical negligence and patient-injury litigation, including a cerebral-palsy birth-injury appeal and a clinical-negligence suit, extended into a consumer-protection claim over a defective intraocular lens and a contested family matter.
What did the cerebral-palsy appeal concern?
A child born with cerebral palsy said to result from hypoxia during childbirth, raising the duty of care of a medical facility and the person in charge, and the court's power to refer to medical opinion; he appeared for the appellant before the Court of Appeal.
How does the consumer-protection matter connect to the rest of the profile?
It concerned a defective intraocular lens argued under several provisions of the Consumer Protection Act 1999, extending the patient-safety theme from clinical negligence to statutory liability for unsafe medical products.