Badrina Ibtisam Binti Badrul Hisham
About Badrina Ibtisam Binti Badrul Hisham
Badrina Ibtisam Binti Badrul Hisham appears as counsel of record in 3 reported Malaysia judgments (2025). These were heard before MYHC (3).
On the court record
The reported matters span civil-procedure and commercial-contract work, from summary determination and striking out to the enforcement of a consent order, grounded in High Court judgments.
Badrina Ibtisam Binti Badrul Hisham's reported matters are concentrated in civil procedure and commercial contract, argued in the High Court. Two of the matters concern the striking out or summary disposal of a claim. In an appeal from the Sessions Court, the question was whether the issues were suitable for determination under Order 14A of the Rules of Court 2012, which allows the summary determination of questions of law without a full trial; appearing for the appellants, the Court, cautioning that it would not approve attempts to circumvent orders, statutory regimes or contractual preconditions under cover of a multiplicity of suits in an unfitting medium, dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Sessions Court. In a separate matter she appeared for an appellant challenging a decision to strike out a writ and amended statement of claim under Order 18 rule 19 in a dispute over a sale-and-purchase agreement; there the Court found the Sessions Court had erred in striking out the pleading and allowed the appeal.
Commercial contract features in a High Court matter where a preliminary issue arose from a failure to comply with a consent order requiring the deposit of security for costs, the consent order being treated as a contract binding on the parties. Appearing for the plaintiff, the Court dismissed the defendant's counterclaim with costs of RM20,000 and declined to allow the restitution of a loan of some €200,000 under section 66 of the Contracts Act 1950.
A thread across these decisions is the disciplined use of the court's procedural powers, from the summary determination of questions of law and the striking out of pleadings to the enforcement of a consent order as a binding contract, argued in the High Court of Malaya. The reported work thus sits in the civil-procedure and commercial-contract fields, grounded in the judgments rather than any ranking, and reflects a practice attentive to when a claim should be resolved summarily and when it must go to trial.
How many cases has Badrina Ibtisam Binti Badrul Hisham appeared in?
Badrina Ibtisam Binti Badrul Hisham appears as counsel of record in 3 reported Malaysia judgments (2025).
Which courts does Badrina Ibtisam Binti Badrul Hisham appear in?
Badrina Ibtisam Binti Badrul Hisham appears before MYHC (3).
What areas of law feature in Badrina Ibtisam Binti Badrul Hisham's reported cases?
They are concentrated in civil procedure, including summary determination under Order 14A and striking out under Order 18 rule 19 of the Rules of Court 2012, and commercial contract, including the enforcement of a consent order as a binding contract.
What did the Court say about multiplicity of suits in the Order 14A appeal?
Appearing for the appellants, the Court cautioned that it would not approve attempts to circumvent orders, statutory regimes or contractual preconditions under cover of a multiplicity of suits in an unfitting medium, and dismissed the appeal, affirming the Sessions Court.
How was the consent-order and restitution matter resolved?
Treating the consent order requiring security for costs as a binding contract, and appearing for the plaintiff, the Court dismissed the defendant's counterclaim with costs of RM20,000 and declined restitution of a loan of some €200,000 under section 66 of the Contracts Act 1950.