A

Abu Haziq bin Abu Talib

Amelda & Partners Called to the Bar in 2017 4 appearances

About Abu Haziq bin Abu Talib

Abu Haziq bin Abu Talib appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Malaysia judgments (2025). These were heard before MYHC (2) and MYCOA (2).

On the court record

Abu Haziq bin Abu Talib's reported practice is in employment, commercial and property-services litigation, appearing in the High Court and the Court of Appeal and acting for plaintiffs, defendants, respondents and appellants.

His employment work includes a High Court matter in which he acted for plaintiffs who were employees of a charitable foundation, challenging the formation of an executive committee that took over control of their employer and terminated their employment. The case raised whether the employees could seek declarations and compensation in the civil courts rather than the Industrial Court, and whether prayers framed around the tort of conspiracy were obviously unsustainable.

His commercial work includes a contract dispute concerning Jemmings Sdn Bhd (in liquidation) and a construction counterparty, in which he acted for a defendant. The claim was for breach of an agreement ("Tuntutan perlanggaran perjanjian"), turning on whether the defendant's termination of the agreement was valid, whether the plaintiff was entitled to compensation if it was not, and whether any sum should be set off against payments already made.

He also appears in professional-services litigation. In related Court of Appeal matters concerning Propnex Realty Sdn Bhd and a development bank, in which he acted as respondent's and appellant's counsel, the appeals concerned an estate agency agreement and the entitlement of a registered estate agent to its fee under the Valuers, Appraisers, Estate Agents and Property Managers Act 1981 and rule 92(1) of the Estate Agents Rules 1986, and in particular whether the agent was the effective cause of the sale. The practice is employment, contract and property-services litigation, with a recurring focus on entitlement — to a remedy, to compensation, or to a professional fee. Across the employment, contract and agency matters, the court is repeatedly asked who is entitled to be paid or heard, on what legal footing, and in which forum.

4
Appearances
2017
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

How many cases has Abu Haziq bin Abu Talib appeared in?

Abu Haziq bin Abu Talib appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Malaysia judgments (2025).

Which courts does Abu Haziq bin Abu Talib appear in?

Abu Haziq bin Abu Talib appears before MYHC (2) and MYCOA (2).

What areas does Abu Haziq bin Abu Talib practise in these decisions?

Employment, commercial and property-services litigation. His matters include an employment dispute over a charitable foundation's takeover of its own management, a contract-termination claim involving Jemmings Sdn Bhd (in liquidation), and estate-agency fee appeals involving Propnex Realty Sdn Bhd.

What was the charitable-foundation employment dispute about?

Employees of a charitable foundation challenged the formation of an executive committee that took over control of their employer and terminated their employment, seeking declarations and compensation. The case raised whether they could bring the claim in the civil courts rather than the Industrial Court, and whether prayers based on the tort of conspiracy were obviously unsustainable. He acted for the plaintiffs.

What did the estate-agency appeals turn on?

An estate agency agreement and whether a registered estate agent was entitled to its fee under the Valuers, Appraisers, Estate Agents and Property Managers Act 1981 and rule 92(1) of the Estate Agents Rules 1986 — in particular whether the agent was the effective cause of the sale. He acted as respondent's and appellant's counsel across the related Court of Appeal matters involving Propnex Realty Sdn Bhd.

Practice Areas (from case appearances)

Counsel Plaintiff (1)

Counsel Defendant (1)

Counsel Respondent (1)

Counsel Appellant (1)