H

Helmi bin Hamzah

J 5 cases

About J Helmi bin Hamzah

Helmi bin Hamzah has been involved in 5 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning August 2025 to January 2026. These cases are from the High Court (5 cases). Helmi bin Hamzah served as the delivering judge in 5 of these cases.

5

Total Cases

5

Delivered

0

Sat On (Coram)

How many cases has Helmi bin Hamzah been involved in?

Helmi bin Hamzah has been involved in 5 published judgments from August 2025 to January 2026, serving as the delivering judge in 5 of them. Cases span the High Court (5 cases).

What types of cases does Helmi bin Hamzah typically handle?

Based on 5 published judgments, Helmi bin Hamzah's most common case types include Refund of money paid and agreed compensation for breach of the Business Agreement. Contempt of court not purged (1 cases) and Originating Summons: Plaintiff’s late father purchased a piece of land in the name of the Plaintiff and Defendant (1 cases).

Practice Areas

Preliminary issue: failure to comply with a Consent Order concerning depositing security for costs; Consent Order treated as contract binding on the parties; the Plaintiff’s claim should be dismissed with no liberty to file afresh if the Consent Order is not complied with; no unilateral variation of the Consent Order; solicitor’s undertaking cannot substitute for compliance; material inordinate delays. 1 Refund of money paid and agreed compensation for breach of the Business Agreement. Contempt of court not purged 1 Plaintiff entered into main contract with third party for fabrication of vessel for oil and gas industry-Plaintiff also entered into consortium agreement with 2nd Defendant to perform main contract-1st Defendant appointed Project Manager-main contract terminated due to Plaintiff’s default, Defendants took over the performance of the main contract-Plaintiff’s suit premised on breach of fiduciary duties, tort of inducing breach of contract, breach of contract and tort of interference-court found liability established, ordered for damages to be assessed-Plaintiff claims for loss of income from Daily Charter Rate provided in the main contract, and also the contract to maintain vessel-aggravated damages also sought for-whether damages proven-whether facts and evidence support award of aggravated damages. 1 LAND LAW: Trespass to land–continuing trespass (actions de die in diem)-existence of fencing and structures 1 Originating Summons: Plaintiff’s late father purchased a piece of land in the name of the Plaintiff and Defendant 1

Cases Delivered (5)

ba-22ncc-137-11-2021 MYHC

OASIS TEAM SDN BHD v 1. ) STAR LABS BIOSCIENCE SDN BHD 2. ) P'ng Aik Fong

ba-24ncvc-382-02-2025 MYHC

LOGAMMAH A/P RAMASAMY v DARASAMY A/L RAJU

16 September 2025

ba-22ncc-104-08-2021 MYHC

A.H.T. Syngas Technology NV v Future NRG Sdn Bhd

7 September 2025

ba-24ncvc-354-02-2025 MYHC

1. ) Hee Kee Liong 2. ) Hee Chun Keet v PJS TYRE AUTO SERVICE SDN BHD

ba-22ncvc-603-12-2018 MYHC

TRESENERGY SDN BHD v 1. ) MOHD FAUZI BIN YA'AKOB 2. ) MTC ENGINEERING SDN BHD