OCBC BANK (MALAYSIA) BERHAD v 1. ) Irfan Asfaar Bin Abdullah(dahulunya Nagarajan A/l Renganathan) 2. ) JEEVANATHAN A/L MANIKAM

ba-38-1718-05-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 11 February 2026 • BA-38-1718-05/2025 • 12 min read
6 cases cited (0 SG, 6 foreign)

Outcome

The Appeal is allowed, with costs of RM2,000.00, as agreed by the parties.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (ba-38-1718-05-2025). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Order for Sale granted-No appeal-No stay of execution of the Order For Sale- The defendant filed two affidavits in opposition, two corrective affidavits, and requested a higher reserve price to be fixed in the proceedings of the Plaintiff’s Notice of Application to fix the auction date and reserve price. After filing the affidavits in opposition and corrective affidavits and requesting a higher reserve price, the Defendant filed a new civil suit to challenge the Order for Sale. The Defendant also filed an application to stay the proceedings of the Plaintiff’s Notice of Application to fix the auction date and reserve price. Are there any special circumstances?

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Helmi bin Hamzah Delivered

Counsel (4)

Pauline Prathibha & Associates Firm Yong & Rakan Rakan Firm Pauline Prathibha A/P Chandera Counsel Defendant Shantini Koshy a/p Cherian Koshy Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (3)

OCBC Bank Berhad Plaintiff Irfan Asfaar bin Abdullah Defendant Jeevanathan a/l Manikam Defendant

Statutes Cited

D of the National Land Code (Cap 828)
National Land Code (Cap 828)
Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (6)

MY (6)
[2003] 4 CLJ 1 [2004] 1 MLJ 257 [2012] 1 MLJ 761 [2012] 2 CLJ 16 [2016] 8 MLJ 664 [2025] MLJU 2818

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-38-1718-05-2025)